From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
To: Venkat Yekkirala <vyekkirala@TrustedCS.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, jmorris@namei.org,
sds@tycho.nsa.gov, method@gentoo.org,
kmacmillan@mentalrootkit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] NetLabel: secid reconciliation support
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:49:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <451D94DB.1010605@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36282A1733C57546BE392885C0618592015CF3A5@chaos.tcs.tcs-sec.com>
Venkat Yekkirala wrote:
>>@@ -3672,16 +3674,20 @@ static int selinux_skb_flow_in(struct sk
>> if (err)
>> goto out;
>>
>>- if (xfrm_sid) {
>>- err = security_transition_sid(xfrm_sid, skb->secmark,
>>-
>>SECCLASS_PACKET, &trans_sid);
>>- if (err)
>>- goto out;
>>+ if (xfrm_sid)
>>+ skb->secmark = xfrm_sid;
>>
>>- skb->secmark = trans_sid;
>>- }
>>+ err = selinux_netlbl_skb_sid(skb, skb->secmark, &nlbl_sid);
>
>
> I take it nlbl_sid here will be 0 if netlabel is NOT configured
> for the traffic correct?
That would be the desired behavior yes, however, in verifying this
against the
patch I posted I noticed that the dummy function in
security/selinux/include/selinux_netlabel.h is wrong - it should be replaced
with the following (I mistakenly set it to SECINITSID_UNLABELED):
static inline int selinux_netlbl_skb_sid(struct sk_buff *skb,
u32 base_sid,
u32 *sid)
{
*sid = 0;
return 0;
}
>>--- net-2.6.orig/security/selinux/ss/mls.c
>>+++ net-2.6/security/selinux/ss/mls.c
>>@@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ int mls_compute_sid(struct context *scon
>>
>
> &rtr->target_range);
>
>> }
>> }
>>- else if (tclass == SECCLASS_PACKET)
>>+ if (tclass == SECCLASS_PACKET)
>
>
> What's the purpose of getting rid of "else" above?
Fix a compile problem - the braces above the else belong to a for loop.
Feel free to disregard this, it was one of the changes I had to make to
your patch to get it to compile against the latest net-2.6 tree.
> I haven't reviewed the netlbl native changes, but the hooks.c changes
> seem ok to me.
Okay, if you have any other questions you know where to find me.
--
paul moore
linux security @ hp
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
To: Venkat Yekkirala <vyekkirala@TrustedCS.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, jmorris@namei.org,
sds@tycho.nsa.gov, method@gentoo.org,
kmacmillan@mentalrootkit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] NetLabel: secid reconciliation support
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:49:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <451D94DB.1010605@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36282A1733C57546BE392885C0618592015CF3A5@chaos.tcs.tcs-sec.com>
Venkat Yekkirala wrote:
>>@@ -3672,16 +3674,20 @@ static int selinux_skb_flow_in(struct sk
>> if (err)
>> goto out;
>>
>>- if (xfrm_sid) {
>>- err = security_transition_sid(xfrm_sid, skb->secmark,
>>-
>>SECCLASS_PACKET, &trans_sid);
>>- if (err)
>>- goto out;
>>+ if (xfrm_sid)
>>+ skb->secmark = xfrm_sid;
>>
>>- skb->secmark = trans_sid;
>>- }
>>+ err = selinux_netlbl_skb_sid(skb, skb->secmark, &nlbl_sid);
>
>
> I take it nlbl_sid here will be 0 if netlabel is NOT configured
> for the traffic correct?
That would be the desired behavior yes, however, in verifying this
against the
patch I posted I noticed that the dummy function in
security/selinux/include/selinux_netlabel.h is wrong - it should be replaced
with the following (I mistakenly set it to SECINITSID_UNLABELED):
static inline int selinux_netlbl_skb_sid(struct sk_buff *skb,
u32 base_sid,
u32 *sid)
{
*sid = 0;
return 0;
}
>>--- net-2.6.orig/security/selinux/ss/mls.c
>>+++ net-2.6/security/selinux/ss/mls.c
>>@@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ int mls_compute_sid(struct context *scon
>>
>
> &rtr->target_range);
>
>> }
>> }
>>- else if (tclass == SECCLASS_PACKET)
>>+ if (tclass == SECCLASS_PACKET)
>
>
> What's the purpose of getting rid of "else" above?
Fix a compile problem - the braces above the else belong to a for loop.
Feel free to disregard this, it was one of the changes I had to make to
your patch to get it to compile against the latest net-2.6 tree.
> I haven't reviewed the netlbl native changes, but the hooks.c changes
> seem ok to me.
Okay, if you have any other questions you know where to find me.
--
paul moore
linux security @ hp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-29 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-29 21:20 [PATCH 1/1] NetLabel: secid reconciliation support Venkat Yekkirala
2006-09-29 21:20 ` Venkat Yekkirala
2006-09-29 21:49 ` Paul Moore [this message]
2006-09-29 21:49 ` Paul Moore
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-09-29 20:17 [PATCH 0/1] NetLabel: patch against Venkat's secid patchset paul.moore
2006-09-29 20:17 ` [PATCH 1/1] NetLabel: secid reconciliation support paul.moore
2006-09-29 20:17 ` paul.moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=451D94DB.1010605@hp.com \
--to=paul.moore@hp.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kmacmillan@mentalrootkit.com \
--cc=method@gentoo.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=vyekkirala@TrustedCS.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.