From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
To: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
Venkat Yekkirala <vyekkirala@TrustedCS.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, jmorris@namei.org,
eparis@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] NetLabel: secid reconciliation support
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:19:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45217457.6070303@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1159817041.6855.150.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil>
Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 14:06 -0400, paul.moore@hp.com wrote:
>
>>plain text document attachment (netlabel-secid_support)
>>This patch provides the missing NetLabel support to the secid reconciliation
>>patchset.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
>>---
>> security/selinux/hooks.c | 67 +++++++++++------
>> security/selinux/include/objsec.h | 1
>> security/selinux/include/selinux_netlabel.h | 28 +++----
>> security/selinux/ss/services.c | 106 ++++++++++------------------
>> 4 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)
>
>
>>@@ -3725,7 +3723,16 @@ static int selinux_skb_flow_in(struct sk
>>+
>>+ err = avc_has_perm(nlbl_sid, skb->secmark, SECCLASS_PACKET,
>>+ PACKET__FLOW_IN, NULL);
>
>
> This means we end up with two flow_in checks each time, even if only one
> or none of the two labeling mechanisms was used, right? Given the
> conclusion on the discussion of what it means to use them together (just
> redundant), this seems to be pointless overhead.
Okay, how about something like this?
static int selinux_skb_flow_in(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned short family)
{
u32 xfrm_sid;
u32 nlbl_sid;
u32 ext_sid;
int err;
if (selinux_compat_net)
return 1;
/*
* loopback traffic already labeled and
* flow-controlled on outbound. We may
* need to flow-control on the inbound
* as well if there's ever a use-case for it.
*/
if (skb->dev == &loopback_dev)
return 1;
err = selinux_xfrm_decode_session(skb, &xfrm_sid, 0);
BUG_ON(err);
err = selinux_netlbl_skb_sid(skb,
xfrm_sid ? xfrm_sid : skb->secmark,
&nlbl_sid);
if (err)
goto out;
if (nlbl_sid)
ext_sid = nlbl_sid;
else
ext_sid = xfrm_sid;
err = avc_has_perm(ext_sid,
skb->secmark,
SECCLASS_PACKET,
PACKET__FLOW_IN,
NULL);
if (err)
goto out;
if (ext_sid)
skb->secmark = ext_sid;
out:
return err ? 0 : 1;
};
--
paul moore
linux security @ hp
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
To: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
Venkat Yekkirala <vyekkirala@trustedcs.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, jmorris@namei.org,
eparis@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] NetLabel: secid reconciliation support
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:19:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45217457.6070303@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1159817041.6855.150.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil>
Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 14:06 -0400, paul.moore@hp.com wrote:
>
>>plain text document attachment (netlabel-secid_support)
>>This patch provides the missing NetLabel support to the secid reconciliation
>>patchset.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
>>---
>> security/selinux/hooks.c | 67 +++++++++++------
>> security/selinux/include/objsec.h | 1
>> security/selinux/include/selinux_netlabel.h | 28 +++----
>> security/selinux/ss/services.c | 106 ++++++++++------------------
>> 4 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)
>
>
>>@@ -3725,7 +3723,16 @@ static int selinux_skb_flow_in(struct sk
>>+
>>+ err = avc_has_perm(nlbl_sid, skb->secmark, SECCLASS_PACKET,
>>+ PACKET__FLOW_IN, NULL);
>
>
> This means we end up with two flow_in checks each time, even if only one
> or none of the two labeling mechanisms was used, right? Given the
> conclusion on the discussion of what it means to use them together (just
> redundant), this seems to be pointless overhead.
Okay, how about something like this?
static int selinux_skb_flow_in(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned short family)
{
u32 xfrm_sid;
u32 nlbl_sid;
u32 ext_sid;
int err;
if (selinux_compat_net)
return 1;
/*
* loopback traffic already labeled and
* flow-controlled on outbound. We may
* need to flow-control on the inbound
* as well if there's ever a use-case for it.
*/
if (skb->dev == &loopback_dev)
return 1;
err = selinux_xfrm_decode_session(skb, &xfrm_sid, 0);
BUG_ON(err);
err = selinux_netlbl_skb_sid(skb,
xfrm_sid ? xfrm_sid : skb->secmark,
&nlbl_sid);
if (err)
goto out;
if (nlbl_sid)
ext_sid = nlbl_sid;
else
ext_sid = xfrm_sid;
err = avc_has_perm(ext_sid,
skb->secmark,
SECCLASS_PACKET,
PACKET__FLOW_IN,
NULL);
if (err)
goto out;
if (ext_sid)
skb->secmark = ext_sid;
out:
return err ? 0 : 1;
};
--
paul moore
linux security @ hp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-02 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-02 18:06 [PATCH v2 0/1] Respun patch to match the latest secid patchset paul.moore
2006-10-02 18:06 ` paul.moore
2006-10-02 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] NetLabel: secid reconciliation support paul.moore
2006-10-02 18:06 ` paul.moore
2006-10-02 19:24 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-02 19:24 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-02 19:39 ` Paul Moore
2006-10-02 19:39 ` Paul Moore
2006-10-02 20:19 ` Paul Moore [this message]
2006-10-02 20:19 ` Paul Moore
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-02 20:04 Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-02 20:04 ` Venkat Yekkirala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45217457.6070303@hp.com \
--to=paul.moore@hp.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=vyekkirala@TrustedCS.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.