From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexis Bruemmer <alexisb@us.ibm.com>,
Mike Anderson <andmike@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libsas: support NCQ for SATA disks
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 11:43:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45328141.5020705@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1160934124.3544.7.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
James Bottomley wrote:
> This doesn't seem to quite work for me on a SATA-1 disc:
>
> sas: DOING DISCOVERY on port 1, pid:1897
> sas: sas_ata_phy_reset: Found ATA device.
> ata1.00: ATA-7, max UDMA/133, 781422768 sectors: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32)
> ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
> scsi 2:0:1:0: Direct-Access ATA ST3400832AS 3.03 PQ: 0
> ANSI: 5
> SCSI device sdc: 781422768 512-byte hdwr sectors (400088 MB)
> sdc: Write Protect is off
> SCSI device sdc: drive cache: write back
> SCSI device sdc: 781422768 512-byte hdwr sectors (400088 MB)
> sdc: Write Protect is off
> SCSI device sdc: drive cache: write back
> sdc: unknown partition table
> sd 2:0:1:0: Attached scsi disk sdc
> sas: DONE DISCOVERY on port 1, pid:1897, result:0
> sas: command 0xf785f3c0, task 0x00000000, timed out: EH_HANDLED
> sas: command 0xf785f3c0, task 0x00000000, timed out: EH_HANDLED
> [...]
>
> It looks like the first few commands get through (read capacity, ATA
> IDENTIFY etc) and it hangs up on the read for the partition table.
Hm... if I put in some debug printks in the qc_issue code, I get the
same symptoms. I've observed that once again we get hung up on ATA
commands where the tag number > 0. I also noticed this pattern:
1. ATA command w/ tag 0 (command A) issued.
2. Command A goes out to sas-ata.
2. ATA command w/ tag 1 (command B) issued.
3. Command A completes
4. Command B goes out to sas-ata.
[...]
5. Command B times out.
Very odd that this all works if there are no printks. I don't see
anything obvious that would suggest why this apparent race seems to
happen--unless there's some conflict between issuing an ATA command
while completing another one.
--D
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-15 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-13 23:56 [PATCH] libsas: support NCQ for SATA disks Darrick J. Wong
2006-10-15 17:42 ` James Bottomley
2006-10-15 18:43 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2006-10-15 19:42 ` Luben Tuikov
2006-10-16 1:27 ` Mark Rustad
2006-10-16 1:49 ` Andy Warner
2006-10-16 2:22 ` Luben Tuikov
2006-10-16 18:25 ` James Bottomley
2006-10-16 21:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-16 23:34 ` James Bottomley
2006-10-16 22:40 ` Brian King
2006-10-17 11:15 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-17 16:35 ` James Bottomley
2006-10-17 22:42 ` Luben Tuikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45328141.5020705@us.ibm.com \
--to=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=alexisb@us.ibm.com \
--cc=andmike@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.