* SNA questions @ 2012-09-12 8:29 Roberth Sjonøy 2012-09-12 8:52 ` Chris Wilson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Roberth Sjonøy @ 2012-09-12 8:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-gfx Hello Is SNA still under heavy developement? Is the performance still being worked on? Regards, Roberth Sjonøy ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: SNA questions 2012-09-12 8:29 SNA questions Roberth Sjonøy @ 2012-09-12 8:52 ` Chris Wilson 2012-09-12 8:59 ` Roberth Sjonøy 2012-09-12 9:12 ` Roberth Sjonøy 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Chris Wilson @ 2012-09-12 8:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-gfx [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 340 bytes --] On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:29:20 +0200, Roberth Sjonøy <roberth.sjonoy@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello > > Is SNA still under heavy developement? Is the performance still being worked on? The more interesting question is what prompted you to ask? What is it that you truly care about? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --] _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: SNA questions 2012-09-12 8:52 ` Chris Wilson @ 2012-09-12 8:59 ` Roberth Sjonøy 2012-09-12 9:12 ` Roberth Sjonøy 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Roberth Sjonøy @ 2012-09-12 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx Hello Are you psychologist? /joke I wonder if it's planned to be faster, because beside the performance it works very good for me with the right settings regarding the tearing issue. If performance is still under heavy developement? On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:29:20 +0200, Roberth Sjonøy <roberth.sjonoy@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello >> >> Is SNA still under heavy developement? Is the performance still being worked on? > > The more interesting question is what prompted you to ask? What is it > that you truly care about? > -Chris > > -- > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: SNA questions 2012-09-12 8:52 ` Chris Wilson 2012-09-12 8:59 ` Roberth Sjonøy @ 2012-09-12 9:12 ` Roberth Sjonøy 2012-09-12 9:59 ` Chris Wilson 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Roberth Sjonøy @ 2012-09-12 9:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx Hello Are you psychologist? /joke I wonder if it's planned to be faster, because beside the performance it works very good for me with the right settings regarding the tearing issue. If performance is still under heavy developement? Regards Roberth Sjonøy On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:29:20 +0200, Roberth Sjonøy <roberth.sjonoy@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello >> >> Is SNA still under heavy developement? Is the performance still being worked on? > > The more interesting question is what prompted you to ask? What is it > that you truly care about? > -Chris > > -- > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: SNA questions 2012-09-12 9:12 ` Roberth Sjonøy @ 2012-09-12 9:59 ` Chris Wilson 2012-09-12 12:34 ` Robert Sjonøy 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Chris Wilson @ 2012-09-12 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: intel-gfx [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1249 bytes --] On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:12:02 +0200, Roberth Sjonøy <roberth.sjonoy@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello > > Are you psychologist? /joke I just want to know the workloads that are important to you, to make sure they are included in my benchmarking. > I wonder if it's planned to be faster, because beside the performance > it works very good for me with the right settings regarding the > tearing issue. If performance is still under heavy developement? There are a couple of kernel features in the pipeline to speed up some frequent paths, and I plan to do an attack of the gen4+ shaders. Besides a few anomalies in x11perf, the ratelimiting step at the moment is the Render protocol which doesn't provide complete or optimal offload of even the <canvas> spec. And of course, there is plenty within the Render spec that is left to optimise if it finds a use in the wild. As for the tearing issue, there is no nice solution this side of Wayland. The recent hardware has been designed around a compositor, and it is likely that more and more features of the display engine will require compositing. It appears that TearFree is unavoidable and so will need lots of love and further development. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --] _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: SNA questions 2012-09-12 9:59 ` Chris Wilson @ 2012-09-12 12:34 ` Robert Sjonøy 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Robert Sjonøy @ 2012-09-12 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Hello AFAIK I don't use wayland. I guess GTKperf, is more relevant, I use gtk+ applications. Regards, Roberth Sjonøy On 12. sep. 2012, at 11:59, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:12:02 +0200, Roberth Sjonøy <roberth.sjonoy@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello >> >> Are you psychologist? /joke > > I just want to know the workloads that are important to you, to make > sure they are included in my benchmarking. > >> I wonder if it's planned to be faster, because beside the performance >> it works very good for me with the right settings regarding the >> tearing issue. If performance is still under heavy developement? > > There are a couple of kernel features in the pipeline to speed up some > frequent paths, and I plan to do an attack of the gen4+ shaders. Besides > a few anomalies in x11perf, the ratelimiting step at the moment is the > Render protocol which doesn't provide complete or optimal offload of > even the <canvas> spec. And of course, there is plenty within the Render > spec that is left to optimise if it finds a use in the wild. > > As for the tearing issue, there is no nice solution this side of > Wayland. The recent hardware has been designed around a compositor, and > it is likely that more and more features of the display engine will > require compositing. It appears that TearFree is unavoidable and so will > need lots of love and further development. > -Chris > > -- > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-09-12 12:34 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-09-12 8:29 SNA questions Roberth Sjonøy 2012-09-12 8:52 ` Chris Wilson 2012-09-12 8:59 ` Roberth Sjonøy 2012-09-12 9:12 ` Roberth Sjonøy 2012-09-12 9:59 ` Chris Wilson 2012-09-12 12:34 ` Robert Sjonøy
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.