* Simple module for 2.6 request?
@ 2006-11-04 5:05 lkml-2006i-ticket
2006-11-04 6:27 ` Oleg Verych
2006-11-04 9:50 ` Jan Engelhardt
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: lkml-2006i-ticket @ 2006-11-04 5:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hello,
it is not so easy to find online an *working* example of how to by hand
build a module.
gcc -o foo.c -ko foo.ko -DMODULE -D__KERNEL__
-I/usr/src/kernel-headers-directory/include/
with module license define macro
almost worked, but it misses thoes extra symbols created in
post-compilation.
How to add them by hand (not using all the big Makefiles normally
included in kernel tree)?
Like
some-command foo.ko foo.c
insmod foo.ko
done
--
LimCore C++ Software Architect / Team Lead
---> oo Linux programs
limcore
software
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Simple module for 2.6 request?
2006-11-04 5:05 Simple module for 2.6 request? lkml-2006i-ticket
@ 2006-11-04 6:27 ` Oleg Verych
2006-11-04 9:50 ` Jan Engelhardt
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Verych @ 2006-11-04 6:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
> Hello,
> it is not so easy to find online an *working* example of how to by hand
> build a module.
Please find information on how to build (external) modules in
"Documentation/kbuild/modules.txt" directory of your linux source tree.
More (implementation) info can be found in the top Makefile.
> gcc -o foo.c -ko foo.ko -DMODULE -D__KERNEL__
> -I/usr/src/kernel-headers-directory/include/
>
> with module license define macro
>
> almost worked, but it misses thoes extra symbols created in
> post-compilation.
>
> How to add them by hand (not using all the big Makefiles normally
> included in kernel tree)?
>
> Like
> some-command foo.ko foo.c
> insmod foo.ko
> done
____
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Simple module for 2.6 request?
2006-11-04 5:05 Simple module for 2.6 request? lkml-2006i-ticket
2006-11-04 6:27 ` Oleg Verych
@ 2006-11-04 9:50 ` Jan Engelhardt
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan Engelhardt @ 2006-11-04 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lkml-2006i-ticket@limcore.pl; +Cc: linux-kernel
>how to by hand build a module.
Compilation has too many flags and too many steps to be reasonably done
by hand. Unlike *cough* BSD or Solaris, the Linux kernel makefile system
is designed to reasonably support external modules using all the
necessary parameters the kernel you are compiling for needs. You know, I
always get a shudder when I have to think of Solaris not having
MODVERSIONS or even VERMAGIC -- it is dangerous because it allows you to
build stuff that can fubar more easily.
>gcc -o foo.c -ko foo.ko -DMODULE -D__KERNEL__
>-I/usr/src/kernel-headers-directory/include/
gcc: unrecognized option '-ko'
>How to add them by hand (not using all the big Makefiles normally
>included in kernel tree)?
Who said they are big? Look at
http://jengelh.hopto.org/f/oops_ko.tar.bz2 for a _really_ simple module.
-`J'
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-11-04 9:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-11-04 5:05 Simple module for 2.6 request? lkml-2006i-ticket
2006-11-04 6:27 ` Oleg Verych
2006-11-04 9:50 ` Jan Engelhardt
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.