All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: Liang Yang <multisyncfe991@hotmail.com>
Cc: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xensource.com>,
	sameer.ahuja81@gmail.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
	Sameer Ahuja <sameer.ahuja@nechclst.in>
Subject: Re: Vitrual TLBs
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:00:42 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4562096A.6020606@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BAY105-DAV1302C583FC9DAE88BC8EE0F3ED0@phx.gbl>

Liang Yang wrote:
> AMD will provide support for nested paging that caches address 
> translations
> to reduce memory accesses in its latest quad-core CPUs. As the hypervisor
> can get pretty bogged down managing all of this and the processor is
> constantly switching from guest OS mode to hypervisor mode and back, 
> Nesting
> page tables and caching memory addresses are ways of freeing things up 
> as it
> cuts down on memory access time.
>
> So Xen may not need such kind of virtual TLB anymore.

If by virtual TLB you are actually referring to shadow paging (and I 
would argue that they are very different concepts), then sorry, I 
misunderstood the initial question.

Yes, Xen supports shadow paging.  Both Intel and AMD are planning on 
supporting hardware shadow paging too in future processors.  I think it 
remains to be see if the hardware shadow paging is flexible enough to 
totally replace software shadow paging.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Liang
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anthony Liguori" <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
> To: "Sameer Ahuja" <sameer.ahuja@nechclst.in>
> Cc: "Tim Deegan" <Tim.Deegan@xensource.com>; <sameer.ahuja81@gmail.com>;
> <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
> Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 9:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Vitrual TLBs
>
>
>> Sameer Ahuja wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Does XEN have the concept of virtual TLBs?
>>>
>>
>> Not really.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Anthony Liguori
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Sameer
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2006-11-20 20:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-20  7:02 Vitrual TLBs Sameer Ahuja
2006-11-20 16:53 ` Anthony Liguori
2006-11-20 17:23   ` Liang Yang
2006-11-20 20:00     ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-21  3:49 Sameer Ahuja
2006-11-21  3:55 Sameer Ahuja

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4562096A.6020606@us.ibm.com \
    --to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=Tim.Deegan@xensource.com \
    --cc=multisyncfe991@hotmail.com \
    --cc=sameer.ahuja81@gmail.com \
    --cc=sameer.ahuja@nechclst.in \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.