From: Albert Lee <albertcc@tw.ibm.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: Linux IDE <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com>,
matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@free.fr>,
Tobias Powalowski <t.powa@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: waits up to 10 microseconds for early irq problem
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:17:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <456C4514.9090107@tw.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <456BDCAC.4060609@tw.ibm.com>
Albert Lee wrote:
> Some devices raise irq early before clearing the BSY.
> This patch waits up to 10 microseconds to workaround the early irq problem.
>
BTW, the patch is on the hot path. The following is a quick analysis of
the performance penalty introduced by the patch:
1. DMA mode:
The dma_status is checked before reading the alt_status, so we are pretty
sure that it is our interrupt. It's worthwhile to poll alt_status and wait
for BSY to clear in this case.
2. PIO mode with non-shared irq:
It is our interrupt. It's worthwhile to wait a moment for BSY to clear.
3. PIO mode with shared-irq:
If PIO + shared-irq + qc active + other people's irq
=> We waste 10 micro seconds to figure out that it is not our interrupt.
In exchange for the wasted time, we get better tolerance for the
early irq situations.
--
albert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-28 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200611180759.34622.t.powa@gmx.de>
[not found] ` <20061118002357.564dbb9d.akpm@osdl.org>
2006-11-18 21:20 ` possibility to merge via_pata fixes to .19 stable series? Jeff Garzik
2006-11-18 22:43 ` Alan
2006-11-19 3:07 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-19 5:34 ` Tejun Heo
2006-11-19 6:02 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-28 6:52 ` [PATCH] libata: waits up to 10 microseconds for early irq problem Albert Lee
2006-11-28 10:25 ` Alan
2006-11-28 10:27 ` Tejun Heo
2006-11-28 10:46 ` Alan
2006-11-28 14:00 ` Mark Lord
2006-11-28 14:12 ` Alan
2006-11-28 14:16 ` Mark Lord
2006-11-28 11:32 ` Albert Lee
2006-11-28 14:17 ` Albert Lee [this message]
2006-11-28 14:42 ` Mark Lord
2006-11-28 19:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-11-30 9:43 ` [PATCH] libata: blacklist " Albert Lee
2006-11-30 11:29 ` Alan
2006-11-30 20:37 ` Mark Lord
2006-11-30 20:45 ` Mark Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=456C4514.9090107@tw.ibm.com \
--to=albertcc@tw.ibm.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=albertl@mail.com \
--cc=castet.matthieu@free.fr \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlord@pobox.com \
--cc=t.powa@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.