From: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
To: albertl@mail.com
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
Linux IDE <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@free.fr>,
Tobias Powalowski <t.powa@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: blacklist for early irq problem
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:45:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <456F42EA.1020806@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <456EA7D6.2050101@tw.ibm.com>
Albert Lee wrote:
>...
>
> + /* some drives raise INTRQ early before clearing BSY */
> + if (unlikely(qc->dev->horkage & ATA_HORKAGE_EARLY_IRQ))
> + /* wait up to 10 microseconds for BSY to clear */
> + ata_busy_wait_alt(ap, ATA_BUSY, ATA_EARLY_IRQ_WAIT);
> +
> /* check altstatus */
> status = ata_altstatus(ap);
> if (status & ATA_BUSY)
...
I dunno.
I think a much simpler patch could address the same situation,
with *no blacklist* to maintain, and no added overhead required:
/* check altstatus */
+ retries = 10;
+ while (((status = ata_altstatus(ap)) & ATA_BUSY) && --retries) {
+ udelay(1);
+ }
- status = ata_altstatus(ap);
if (status & ATA_BUSY)
This still just does a single access in the hot path, but without any
real added complexity otherwise.
????
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-30 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200611180759.34622.t.powa@gmx.de>
[not found] ` <20061118002357.564dbb9d.akpm@osdl.org>
2006-11-18 21:20 ` possibility to merge via_pata fixes to .19 stable series? Jeff Garzik
2006-11-18 22:43 ` Alan
2006-11-19 3:07 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-19 5:34 ` Tejun Heo
2006-11-19 6:02 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-28 6:52 ` [PATCH] libata: waits up to 10 microseconds for early irq problem Albert Lee
2006-11-28 10:25 ` Alan
2006-11-28 10:27 ` Tejun Heo
2006-11-28 10:46 ` Alan
2006-11-28 14:00 ` Mark Lord
2006-11-28 14:12 ` Alan
2006-11-28 14:16 ` Mark Lord
2006-11-28 11:32 ` Albert Lee
2006-11-28 14:17 ` Albert Lee
2006-11-28 14:42 ` Mark Lord
2006-11-28 19:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-11-30 9:43 ` [PATCH] libata: blacklist " Albert Lee
2006-11-30 11:29 ` Alan
2006-11-30 20:37 ` Mark Lord
2006-11-30 20:45 ` Mark Lord [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=456F42EA.1020806@rtr.ca \
--to=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=albertl@mail.com \
--cc=castet.matthieu@free.fr \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=t.powa@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.