All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: Brad Boyer <flar@allandria.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ensure i_ino uniqueness in filesystems without permanent inode numbers (via idr)
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 21:56:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45723CDB.1060304@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061202053013.GC26389@cynthia.pants.nu>

Brad Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 12:21:36PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
>> Here's an updated (but untested) patch based on your suggestions. I also went
>> ahead and made the exported symbols GPL-only since that seems like it would be
>> appropriate here. Any further thoughts on it?
> 

> This seems like exactly the sort of thing that should be a generic
> service available to all filesystem implementors whether it's GPL or
> not. The usual justification for GPL-only is that it's something
> random modules shouldn't be touching anyway, but it's something that
> some part of the tree which could be a module needs.

My main reasoning for doing this was that the structures involved are 
per-superblock. There is virtually no reason that a filesystem would 
ever need to touch these structures in another filesystem.

So, this is essentially a service to make it easy for filesystems to 
implement i_ino uniqueness. I'm not terribly interested in making things 
easier for proprietary filesystems, so I don't see a real reason to make 
this available to them. They can always implement their own scheme to do 
this.

I'm certainly open to discussion though. Is there a compelling reason to 
open this up to proprietary software authors?

-- Jeff


  reply	other threads:[~2006-12-03  2:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-01 14:48 [RFC][PATCH] ensure i_ino uniqueness in filesystems without permanent inode numbers (via idr) Jeff Layton
2006-12-01 16:52 ` Randy Dunlap
2006-12-01 17:21   ` Jeff Layton
2006-12-01 17:42     ` Randy Dunlap
2006-12-02  5:30     ` Brad Boyer
2006-12-03  2:56       ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2006-12-02 12:58         ` Brad Boyer
2006-12-03 11:52           ` Al Boldi
2006-12-03 12:49           ` Jeff Layton
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-14 20:22 Jeff Layton
2006-11-14 20:26 ` Al Viro
2006-11-15 16:42   ` Jeff Layton
2006-11-15 16:44     ` Jeff Layton
2006-11-16 14:06     ` Al Viro
2006-11-16 14:34       ` Jeff Layton
2006-11-15 17:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-11-15 17:56   ` Jörn Engel
2006-11-15 20:36     ` Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45723CDB.1060304@redhat.com \
    --to=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=flar@allandria.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.