[LARTC] Concerning IP over ATM & IP over Ethernet.

[LARTC] Concerning IP over ATM & IP over Ethernet.

[Brenda Lindsay Williams]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 391 bytes --]

Hi there.I'm Brenda from the Australia,I wanna work on a project relating to
VOIP QoS.I wanna evaluate IP over ATM against IP over Ethernet on the
following parameters relating to voice and video traffic;

bandwidth consumption
packet loss
packet delay(latency)
jitter
traffic thoroughput

Is this project feasible?Can I use NS to simulate the models?I hope you
reply.Thanks.

Best regards.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 472 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 143 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Re: [LARTC] Concerning IP over ATM & IP over Ethernet.

[Grant Taylor]

Brenda Lindsay Williams wrote:
> Hi there.I'm Brenda from the Australia,I wanna work on a project 
> relating to VOIP QoS.I wanna evaluate IP over ATM against IP over 
> Ethernet on the following parameters relating to voice and video traffic;
> 
> bandwidth consumption
> packet loss
> packet delay(latency)
> jitter
> traffic thoroughput
> 
> Is this project feasible?Can I use NS to simulate the models?I hope you 
> reply.Thanks.

Do some reading on the 'patch to allow for the ATM "cell tax"' thread 
previously this year.  I think you will find some links to some good 
information on what you are wanting to do.  Something to keep in mind is 
the difference between Classical IP directly on an ATM VC verses Bridged 
Ethernet (RFC 1483 / 2684) and it's associated PPPoE there in..  There 
is also ATM LAN Emulation to content with.

http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2006q1/018287.html



Grant. . . .
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc