From: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>
To: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Results 2.6.17 vs 2.6.19
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:44:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45A6698B.4080504@imc-berlin.de> (raw)
Hi all,
I tried to reproduce the results shown on
http://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Cyclictest
So I ran
cyclictest -t 1 -p 80 -i 10000 -n -l 10000 and
cyclictest -t 1 -p 80 -i 10000 -l 10000
on my emdedded x86 Celeron, 600MHz using 2.6.17-rt3 and 2.6.19-rt15. Funny
enough the older version seems to be better:
2.6.17-rt3 4 33 10
2.6.19-rt15 9 31 19
2.6.17-rt3 4 35 19
2.6.19-rt15 16 38 29
2.6.17-rt3 11 34 22
2.6.19-rt15 27 55 42
2.6.17-rt3 24 47 33
2.6.19-rt15 41 100 56
Is there a known explanation?
Think I try to test some 2.6.20-rt tomorrow ...
--
Steven
next reply other threads:[~2007-01-11 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-11 16:44 Steven Scholz [this message]
2007-01-12 10:17 ` Results 2.6.17 vs 2.6.19 Steven Scholz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45A6698B.4080504@imc-berlin.de \
--to=steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.