From: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>
To: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Results 2.6.17 vs 2.6.19
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:17:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45A76034.307@imc-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45A6698B.4080504@imc-berlin.de>
Hi,
I wrote:
> So I ran
>
> cyclictest -t 1 -p 80 -i 10000 -n -l 10000 and
> cyclictest -t 1 -p 80 -i 10000 -l 10000
>
> on my emdedded x86 Celeron, 600MHz using 2.6.17-rt3 and 2.6.19-rt15. Funny
> enough the older version seems to be better:
>
>
> 2.6.17-rt3 24 47 33
> 2.6.19-rt15 41 100 56
> ...
> Is there a known explanation?
>
> Think I try to test some 2.6.20-rt tomorrow ...
2.6.20-rc4-rt3 is similar to 2.6.19 thus still slower then 2.6.17 ...
--
Steven
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-12 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-11 16:44 Results 2.6.17 vs 2.6.19 Steven Scholz
2007-01-12 10:17 ` Steven Scholz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45A76034.307@imc-berlin.de \
--to=steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.