All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Alan <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Akira Iguchi <akira2.iguchi@toshiba.co.jp>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	kou.ishizaki@toshiba.co.jp, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
	arnd@arndb.de, paulus@samba.org, linas@austin.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] libata-sff.c: add another IRQ calls
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:05:45 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45AD4C39.3050202@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070116120450.1bb44ebb@localhost.localdomain>

Alan wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:46:23 +0900
> Akira Iguchi <akira2.iguchi@toshiba.co.jp> wrote:
> 
>> When enabling IRQ, ap->ops->irq_on is checked.
>> Because most drivers can use ata_irq_on() as is, this
>> patch allows ap->ops->irq_on to be NULL.
>> If it is NULL, ata_irq_on() are used.
> 
> 
> I believe you can now remove the if(ap->ioaddr.ctl_addr) check as any
> device lacking a ctl_addr can now provide an irq_on() method using your
> changes.
> 
> You've fixed the FIXME 

Agreed.

Abstracting out the Control/Alt-Status register block operations has 
been a long-standing TODO that I knew would be required, sometime down 
the line.  I certainly support adding such abstractions, as they are 
required for several non-x86 IDE drivers, not just Cell.

	Jeff




WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Alan <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] libata-sff.c: add another IRQ calls
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:05:45 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45AD4C39.3050202@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070116120450.1bb44ebb@localhost.localdomain>

Alan wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:46:23 +0900
> Akira Iguchi <akira2.iguchi@toshiba.co.jp> wrote:
> 
>> When enabling IRQ, ap->ops->irq_on is checked.
>> Because most drivers can use ata_irq_on() as is, this
>> patch allows ap->ops->irq_on to be NULL.
>> If it is NULL, ata_irq_on() are used.
> 
> 
> I believe you can now remove the if(ap->ioaddr.ctl_addr) check as any
> device lacking a ctl_addr can now provide an irq_on() method using your
> changes.
> 
> You've fixed the FIXME 

Agreed.

Abstracting out the Control/Alt-Status register block operations has 
been a long-standing TODO that I knew would be required, sometime down 
the line.  I certainly support adding such abstractions, as they are 
required for several non-x86 IDE drivers, not just Cell.

	Jeff

  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-16 22:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200701161046.l0GAkE5u029367@toshiba.co.jp>
2007-01-16 12:04 ` [PATCH 3/4] libata-sff.c: add another IRQ calls Alan
2007-01-16 12:04   ` Alan
2007-01-16 22:05   ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2007-01-16 22:05     ` Jeff Garzik
2007-01-16 10:46 Akira Iguchi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-01-16 10:46 Akira Iguchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45AD4C39.3050202@garzik.org \
    --to=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=akira2.iguchi@toshiba.co.jp \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=kou.ishizaki@toshiba.co.jp \
    --cc=linas@austin.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.