All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Klaus Strebel <klaus.strebel@gmx.net>
Cc: jamesb@loreland.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: problem with latest xfsprogs progress code
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:54:42 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45AE46C2.6090005@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45AE2DDF.5000602@gmx.net>

Klaus Strebel wrote:

>>> Running 2.8.18 xfs_repair on a largeish (65TB, ~70M inodes) filesystem on
>>> an x86_64 machine gives the following "progress" output:
>>>
>>> 12:15:36: process known inodes and inode discovery - 1461632 of 0 inod
>>> es done
>>> 12:15:36: Phase 3: elapsed time 14 minutes, 32 seconds - processed 100
>>> 571 inodes per minute
>>> 12:15:36: Phase 3: 0% done - estimated remaining time 3364 weeks, 3 da
>>> ys, 7 hours, 30 minutes, 45 seconds
>>>
>>> Is this a known bug?
> Hi James,
> 
> why do you think that this is a bug? You have an almost infinitely large
> filesystem, so the file-system check will also run for an almost
> infinitely long time ;-).
> 
> You see, not all that's possible is really desirable.

Well, while 65TB is impressive*, and repairing it quickly is indeed a
challenge, it probably still should not take 64+ years.  ;-)

Sounds like something is in fact going wrong.

-Eric

*it amuses me to see xfs users refer to nearly 100T as largeISH; clearly
 you all do not suffer from lowered expectations.  :)

  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-17 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-16 16:30 problem with latest xfsprogs progress code James Braid
2007-01-17 11:00 ` James Braid
2007-01-17 14:08   ` Klaus Strebel
2007-01-17 15:54     ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2007-01-17 22:51       ` David Chatterton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45AE46C2.6090005@sandeen.net \
    --to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=jamesb@loreland.org \
    --cc=klaus.strebel@gmx.net \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.