From: David Chatterton <chatz@melbourne.sgi.com>
To: jamesb@loreland.org
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
Klaus Strebel <klaus.strebel@gmx.net>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: problem with latest xfsprogs progress code
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 09:51:26 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45AEA86E.1060003@melbourne.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45AE46C2.6090005@sandeen.net>
Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Klaus Strebel wrote:
>
>>>> Running 2.8.18 xfs_repair on a largeish (65TB, ~70M inodes) filesystem on
>>>> an x86_64 machine gives the following "progress" output:
>>>>
>>>> 12:15:36: process known inodes and inode discovery - 1461632 of 0 inod
>>>> es done
>>>> 12:15:36: Phase 3: elapsed time 14 minutes, 32 seconds - processed 100
>>>> 571 inodes per minute
>>>> 12:15:36: Phase 3: 0% done - estimated remaining time 3364 weeks, 3 da
>>>> ys, 7 hours, 30 minutes, 45 seconds
>>>>
>>>> Is this a known bug?
>> Hi James,
>>
>> why do you think that this is a bug? You have an almost infinitely large
>> filesystem, so the file-system check will also run for an almost
>> infinitely long time ;-).
>>
>> You see, not all that's possible is really desirable.
>
> Well, while 65TB is impressive*, and repairing it quickly is indeed a
> challenge, it probably still should not take 64+ years. ;-)
>
> Sounds like something is in fact going wrong.
>
> -Eric
>
> *it amuses me to see xfs users refer to nearly 100T as largeISH; clearly
> you all do not suffer from lowered expectations. :)
>
Barry is at linux.conf.au this week, he knows this code better than
anyone else.
Phase 3 is scanning the inodes in each allocation group, building up a
map of filesystem blocks that are marked as used.
See http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/training/xfs_slides_11_repair.pdf
Scanning an AG and its inodes should not be taking this long.
Are you under memory pressure and the machine is just swapping to death?
Are you seeing I/O errors on the storage?
Is the storage using AVT mode and the luns are flipping between controllers?
Thanks,
David
--
David Chatterton
XFS Engineering Manager
SGI Australia
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-17 22:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-16 16:30 problem with latest xfsprogs progress code James Braid
2007-01-17 11:00 ` James Braid
2007-01-17 14:08 ` Klaus Strebel
2007-01-17 15:54 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-01-17 22:51 ` David Chatterton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45AEA86E.1060003@melbourne.sgi.com \
--to=chatz@melbourne.sgi.com \
--cc=jamesb@loreland.org \
--cc=klaus.strebel@gmx.net \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.