From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
To: Sevrin Robstad <quackyo@start.no>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bad performance on RAID 5
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:38:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45AEA550.5070005@lucidpixels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45AE9640.1040500@start.no>
Sevrin Robstad wrote:
> I'm suffering from bad performance on my RAID5.
>
> a "echo check >/sys/block/md0/md/sync_action"
>
> gives a speed at only about 5000K/sec , and HIGH load average :
>
> # uptime
> 20:03:55 up 8 days, 19:55, 1 user, load average: 11.70, 4.04, 1.52
>
> kernel is 2.6.18.1.2257.fc5
> mdadm is v2.5.5
>
> the system consist of an athlon XP1,2GHz and two Sil3114 4port S-ATA
> PCI cards with a total of 6 250gb S-ATA drives connected.
>
> [root@compaq ~]# mdadm --detail /dev/md0
> /dev/md0:
> Version : 00.90.03
> Creation Time : Tue Dec 5 00:33:01 2006
> Raid Level : raid5
> Array Size : 1218931200 (1162.46 GiB 1248.19 GB)
> Device Size : 243786240 (232.49 GiB 249.64 GB)
> Raid Devices : 6
> Total Devices : 6
> Preferred Minor : 0
> Persistence : Superblock is persistent
>
> Update Time : Wed Jan 17 23:14:39 2007
> State : clean
> Active Devices : 6
> Working Devices : 6
> Failed Devices : 0
> Spare Devices : 0
>
> Layout : left-symmetric
> Chunk Size : 256K
>
> UUID : 27dce477:6f45d11b:77377d08:732fa0e6
> Events : 0.58
>
> Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
> 0 8 1 0 active sync /dev/sda1
> 1 8 17 1 active sync /dev/sdb1
> 2 8 33 2 active sync /dev/sdc1
> 3 8 49 3 active sync /dev/sdd1
> 4 8 65 4 active sync /dev/sde1
> 5 8 81 5 active sync /dev/sdf1
> [root@compaq ~]#
>
>
> Sevrin
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
If they are on the PCI bus, that is about right, you probably should be
getting 10-15MB/s, but it is about right. If you had each drive on its
own PCI-e controller, then you would get much faster speeds.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-17 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-17 21:33 bad performance on RAID 5 Sevrin Robstad
2007-01-17 22:38 ` Justin Piszcz [this message]
2007-01-18 9:06 ` Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)
2007-01-18 18:20 ` Sevrin Robstad
2007-01-18 19:56 ` Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)
2007-01-18 23:01 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-01-18 18:19 ` Sevrin Robstad
2007-01-18 19:02 ` Mark Hahn
2007-01-18 20:47 ` Sevrin Robstad
2007-01-18 18:29 ` Steve Cousins
2007-01-18 20:43 ` Sevrin Robstad
2007-01-18 23:10 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-01-21 17:08 ` Nix
2007-01-21 19:09 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-01-19 1:33 ` dean gaudet
2007-01-20 10:18 ` Roger Lucas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45AEA550.5070005@lucidpixels.com \
--to=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quackyo@start.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.