From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Steve Cousins <steve.cousins@maine.edu>
Cc: Sevrin Robstad <quackyo@start.no>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bad performance on RAID 5
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 18:10:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45AFFE72.8070709@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45AFBC85.8020500@maine.edu>
) Steve Cousins wrote:
> Sevrin Robstad wrote:
>> I'm suffering from bad performance on my RAID5.
>>
>> a "echo check >/sys/block/md0/md/sync_action"
>>
>> gives a speed at only about 5000K/sec , and HIGH load average :
>
> What do you get when you try something like:
>
> time dd if=/dev/zero of=/mount-point/test.dat bs=1024k count=1024
That doesn't give valid (repeatable) results due to caching issues. Go
back to the thread I started on RAID-5 write, and see my results. More
important, the way I got rid of the cache effects (beside an unloaded
systems) was:
sync; time bash -c "dd if=/dev/zero bs=1024k count=2048
of=/mnt/point/file; sync"
I empty the cache, then time the dd including the sync at the end.
Results are far more repeatable.
I actually was able to create custom arrays on unused devices to play
with array setting, once you use the array you can't tune as much.
>
> where /mount-point is where /dev/md0 is mounted.
>
> This will create a 1 GiB file and it will tell you how long it takes
> to create it. Also, I'd try running Bonnie++ on it to see what the
> different performance values are.
>
> I don't know a lot about the md sync process but I remember having my
> sync action stuck at a low value at one point and it didn't have
> anything to do with the performance of the RAID array in general.
>
> Steve
>
>> # uptime
>> 20:03:55 up 8 days, 19:55, 1 user, load average: 11.70, 4.04, 1.52
>>
>> kernel is 2.6.18.1.2257.fc5
>> mdadm is v2.5.5
>>
>> the system consist of an athlon XP1,2GHz and two Sil3114 4port S-ATA
>> PCI cards with a total of 6 250gb S-ATA drives connected.
>>
>> [root@compaq ~]# mdadm --detail /dev/md0
>> /dev/md0:
>> Version : 00.90.03
>> Creation Time : Tue Dec 5 00:33:01 2006
>> Raid Level : raid5
>> Array Size : 1218931200 (1162.46 GiB 1248.19 GB)
>> Device Size : 243786240 (232.49 GiB 249.64 GB)
>> Raid Devices : 6
>> Total Devices : 6
>> Preferred Minor : 0
>> Persistence : Superblock is persistent
>>
>> Update Time : Wed Jan 17 23:14:39 2007
>> State : clean
>> Active Devices : 6
>> Working Devices : 6
>> Failed Devices : 0
>> Spare Devices : 0
>>
>> Layout : left-symmetric
>> Chunk Size : 256K
>>
>> UUID : 27dce477:6f45d11b:77377d08:732fa0e6
>> Events : 0.58
>>
>> Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
>> 0 8 1 0 active sync /dev/sda1
>> 1 8 17 1 active sync /dev/sdb1
>> 2 8 33 2 active sync /dev/sdc1
>> 3 8 49 3 active sync /dev/sdd1
>> 4 8 65 4 active sync /dev/sde1
>> 5 8 81 5 active sync /dev/sdf1
>> [root@compaq ~]#
>>
>>
>> Sevrin
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
CTO TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-18 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-17 21:33 bad performance on RAID 5 Sevrin Robstad
2007-01-17 22:38 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-01-18 9:06 ` Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)
2007-01-18 18:20 ` Sevrin Robstad
2007-01-18 19:56 ` Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)
2007-01-18 23:01 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-01-18 18:19 ` Sevrin Robstad
2007-01-18 19:02 ` Mark Hahn
2007-01-18 20:47 ` Sevrin Robstad
2007-01-18 18:29 ` Steve Cousins
2007-01-18 20:43 ` Sevrin Robstad
2007-01-18 23:10 ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
2007-01-21 17:08 ` Nix
2007-01-21 19:09 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-01-19 1:33 ` dean gaudet
2007-01-20 10:18 ` Roger Lucas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45AFFE72.8070709@tmr.com \
--to=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quackyo@start.no \
--cc=steve.cousins@maine.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.