[Xenomai-core] Doubts about the Xenomai list

[Xenomai-core] Doubts about the Xenomai list

[Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas]

Hi, I've noted recently that my message has disappeared from the list. Is this a bug, or it was
removed due the message size. If so, I'm sorry for the attachments, but I would like to be
notified so that I could send another message without the attachments.

I would also be thankful If someone here could host my articles for a while (a month or two), so
that I could send him/her an e-mail with the articles and he/she would make them availables on the
host and send me the link. When I have some time, I'll go to my college to put them on my homepage
(I can't do it from home).

Thank you,

Rodrigo.


__________________________________________________
Fale com seus amigos  de graça com o novo Yahoo! Messenger 
http://br.messenger.yahoo.com/ 

Re: [Xenomai-core] Doubts about the Xenomai list

[Dmitry Adamushko]

Hi,

I think moderators may comment on your question. I just take an
opportunity to make a minor comment on the papers' content (a part of
it).

I read briefly only the part of your thesis regarding the Xenomai and
RTAI parts (page 4).

Frankly speaking (and based on my humble opinion/knowledge of
Xenomai), the information is badly presented, both historically- and
technically-wise, at the very least.

Starting from the very first sentence: "Xenomai: Forked from RTAI...".

Have you ever (if not publicly then privately) asked somebody from the
list to read/review your papers? I guess, no. But that would
definitely have been a good idea.


-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry Adamushko

Re: [Xenomai-core] Doubts about the Xenomai list

[Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas]

Dmitry Adamushko escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> I think moderators may comment on your question. I just take an
> opportunity to make a minor comment on the papers' content (a part of
> it).
Thank you for that.
> I read briefly only the part of your thesis regarding the Xenomai and
> RTAI parts (page 4).
>
> Frankly speaking (and based on my humble opinion/knowledge of
> Xenomai), the information is badly presented, both historically- and
> technically-wise, at the very least.
I would really appreciate if could cite some further parts and comment 
on them.
> Starting from the very first sentence: "Xenomai: Forked from RTAI...".
As far as I know, Xenomai is the evolution of fusion, a parallel project 
that cooperated with RTAI. Is that wrong?
> Have you ever (if not publicly then privately) asked somebody from the
> list to read/review your papers? I guess, no. But that would
> definitely have been a good idea.
Yes, I feel I should have done that. I have asked for enlightment in 
some topics, but I should really ask for someone here to read it. My 
mistake...

Thank you for your input, Dmitry. Hope to have some feedback from other 
topics if you don't mind. I would put an errata in the index page that 
will link to the articles.

Regards,

Rodrigo.


	
	
		
_______________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - Sempre a melhor opção para você! 
Experimente já e veja as novidades. 
http://br.yahoo.com/mailbeta/tudonovo/