All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Xenomai-help] xenomai and CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT ?
@ 2007-01-25  9:49 Steven Scholz
  2007-01-25 10:26 ` Eric Noulard
  2007-01-25 10:57 ` Jan Kiszka
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Steven Scholz @ 2007-01-25  9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Xenomai Help

Hi all,

is it possible (and reasonable) to use Ingo's real time patches from
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/realtime-preempt combined with xenomai?

Thanks,

Steven


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [Xenomai-help] xenomai and CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT ?
  2007-01-25  9:49 [Xenomai-help] xenomai and CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT ? Steven Scholz
@ 2007-01-25 10:26 ` Eric Noulard
  2007-01-25 10:57 ` Jan Kiszka
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric Noulard @ 2007-01-25 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steven Scholz; +Cc: Xenomai help

2007/1/25, Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@domain.hid>:
> Hi all,
>
> is it possible (and reasonable) to use Ingo's real time patches from
> http://people.redhat.com/mingo/realtime-preempt combined with xenomai?

This does not totally answer the question but did you see
the statement concerning PREEMPT_RT in the Xenomai Roadmap.
http://www.xenomai.org/index.php/Xenomai:Roadmap

I'm interested in knowing if Xenomai will try to use PREEMPT_RT soon
or waiting for PREEMPT_RT to come in the mainstream kernel (if it does...)

-- 
Erk


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [Xenomai-help] xenomai and CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT ?
  2007-01-25  9:49 [Xenomai-help] xenomai and CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT ? Steven Scholz
  2007-01-25 10:26 ` Eric Noulard
@ 2007-01-25 10:57 ` Jan Kiszka
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kiszka @ 2007-01-25 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steven Scholz; +Cc: Xenomai Help

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1476 bytes --]

Steven Scholz wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> is it possible (and reasonable) to use Ingo's real time patches from
> http://people.redhat.com/mingo/realtime-preempt combined with xenomai?

Starting to become a FAQ :). See also our roadmap or browse the mailing
list archive (e.g.
https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-help/2006-11/msg00336.html).

To repeat the essence:

 o Combining both patches is currently challenging due to both touching
   similar subsystems. Unless concrete requirements emerge, a combined
   patch may not appear before PREEMPT_RT is mainline (due to
   maintenance costs).

 o Xenomai for PREEMPT_RT is on our roadmap (also independently of
   PREEMPT_RT becoming mainline). It aims at supporting Xenomai's skins
   as-is over the PREEMPT_RT infrastructure as an alternative to the
   I-pipe/co-scheduling path, but will most probably not obsolete the
   latter.

 o There are application scenarios imaginable where the combined usage
   of both RT-technologies (I-pipe over PREEMPT_RT) would make sense and
   add value, but the common case with Xenomai will be to choose one
   base technology during system configuration.

Regarding the unavoidable question "When?": Resources are finite and
require careful schedule. So that schedule depends on users explaining
their needs for certain features, on contributors starting to commit
themselves on the development, or on sponsors pushing the work on
desired features.

Jan


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 249 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-01-25 10:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-01-25  9:49 [Xenomai-help] xenomai and CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT ? Steven Scholz
2007-01-25 10:26 ` Eric Noulard
2007-01-25 10:57 ` Jan Kiszka

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.