* How to interprete ReiserFS warnings?
@ 2007-01-30 12:06 Tanel Kokk
[not found] ` <200701301708.14742.vs@namesys.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tanel Kokk @ 2007-01-30 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: reiserfs-list
There are reiserfs warning messages in dmesg:
ReiserFS: cciss/c1d0p6: warning: vs-13060: reiserfs_update_sd: stat data
of object [454 231 0x0 SD] (nlink == 1) not found (pos 1)
ReiserFS: cciss/c1d0p6: warning: vs-13060: reiserfs_update_sd: stat data
of object [454 231 0x0 SD] (nlink == 1) not found (pos 1)
ReiserFS: cciss/c1d0p6: warning: vs-13060: reiserfs_update_sd: stat data
of object [454 231 0x0 SD] (nlink == 1) not found (pos 1)
reiserfsck /dev/cciss/c1d0p6 didn't find any errors.
my question is: how can I find out, to which file this "[454 231 0x0 SD]
data of object" refers?
my system: linux-2.6.18.3 SMP
distro: debian sarge 3.1
reiserfsprogs-v3.6.19-1
Tanel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread[parent not found: <200701301708.14742.vs@namesys.com>]
* Re: How to interprete ReiserFS warnings? [not found] ` <200701301708.14742.vs@namesys.com> @ 2007-01-30 13:31 ` Tanel Kokk 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Tanel Kokk @ 2007-01-30 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vladimir V. Saveliev; +Cc: reiserfs-list Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: > Hello > > On Tuesday 30 January 2007 15:06, Tanel Kokk wrote: >> There are reiserfs warning messages in dmesg: >> >> ReiserFS: cciss/c1d0p6: warning: vs-13060: reiserfs_update_sd: stat data >> of object [454 231 0x0 SD] (nlink == 1) not found (pos 1) >> ReiserFS: cciss/c1d0p6: warning: vs-13060: reiserfs_update_sd: stat data >> of object [454 231 0x0 SD] (nlink == 1) not found (pos 1) >> ReiserFS: cciss/c1d0p6: warning: vs-13060: reiserfs_update_sd: stat data >> of object [454 231 0x0 SD] (nlink == 1) not found (pos 1) >> >> reiserfsck /dev/cciss/c1d0p6 didn't find any errors. >> > the above warnings indicate some kind of corruptions: file inode was not found in storage tree. > > So, as long as reiserfsck does not find anything something does not work as expected. > How often do the warnings come up? These 3 message are all, no more errors were discovered: Jan 30 00:00:01 host kernel: ReiserFS: cciss/c1d0p6: warning: vs-13060: reiserfs_update_sd: stat data of object [454 231 0x0 SD] (nlink == 1) not found (pos 1) Jan 30 00:00:01 host last message repeated 2 times Jan 30 12:37:01 host kernel: ReiserFS: cciss/c1d0p6: found reiserfs format "3.6" with standard journal Jan 30 12:37:02 host kernel: ReiserFS: cciss/c1d0p6: using ordered data mode Jan 30 12:37:02 host kernel: ReiserFS: cciss/c1d0p6: journal params: device cciss/c1d0p6, size 8192, journal first bl ock 18, max trans len 1024, max batch 900, max commit age 30, max trans age 30 Jan 30 12:37:02 host kernel: ReiserFS: cciss/c1d0p6: checking transaction log (cciss/c1d0p6) Jan 30 12:37:02 host kernel: ReiserFS: cciss/c1d0p6: Using r5 hash to sort names > >> my question is: how can I find out, to which file this "[454 231 0x0 SD] >> data of object" refers? >> > > find -inum 231 > > Does this file still exist? Yes! file with inode 231 still exists and is accessible (it is log-file) I am quite sensible about reiserfs warnings at the moment, because during half a year there was about 6-7 incidents, where filesystems with reiserfs went "bad". All of them were on different servers, so I would doupt that reasons are hardware-like. At the moment one reiserfsck in one server is running about 4-5 days already. And still in 2. stage at "60%." (fs size ca 400G) Tanel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-01-30 13:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-01-30 12:06 How to interprete ReiserFS warnings? Tanel Kokk
[not found] ` <200701301708.14742.vs@namesys.com>
2007-01-30 13:31 ` Tanel Kokk
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.