Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [RFC, PATCH 4/4] Add support to OProfile for profiling Cell BE SPUs -- update

[Maynard Johnson <maynardj@us.ibm.com>]

Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

>>I've given this some more thought, and I'm coming to the conclusion that 
>>a pure array-based implementation for holding cached_info (getting rid 
>>of the lists) would work well for the vast majority of cases in which 
>>OProfile will be used.  Yes, it is true that the mapping of an SPU 
>>context to a phsyical spu-numbered array location cannot be guaranteed 
>>to stay valid, and that's why I discard the cached_info at that array 
>>location when the SPU task is switched out.  Yes, it would be terribly 
>>inefficient if the same SPU task gets switched back in later and we 
>>would have to recreate the cached_info.  However, I contend that 
>>OProfile users are interested in profiling one application at a time. 
>>They are not going to want to muddy the waters with multiple SPU apps 
>>running at the same time.  I can't think of any reason why someone would 
>>conscisouly choose to do that.
>>
>>Any thoughts from the general community, especially OProfile users?
> 
> 
> Well, it's my understanding that quite a few typical usage scenario
> involve different tasks running on different SPUs passing each other
> data around.
That shouldn't be a problem.  I would consider this to be "one large 
application" consisting of multiple SPU binaries running simultaneously. 
  Such a scenario can be handled with no negative performance impact 
using a simple 16 element array of cached_info objects -- as long as 
there isn't (much) SPU task switching being done.

-Maynard
> 
> Ben.
> 
>