All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry Finger <larry.finger@lwfinger.net>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix for oops on resume
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 07:23:45 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45C9D2E1.7040906@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1170850549.6798.22.camel@johannes.berg>

Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 11:39 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
>> There is a kernel oops on bcm43xx when resuming due to an overly tight timeout loop.
> 
> Come to think of it... Is there any chance of fixing the actual oops
> that happens in this case? I can imagine broken hardware or firmware
> that causes this as well and we don't really want to oops in that case
> either... That's why we have the timeout in the first place, to not hang
> there forever.
> 
> Nothing against this patch though.

As you suggested earlier, a slow clock setting in the bcm43xx device may be the cause of this
difficulty. If my laptop would suspend/resume correctly, then I could test various fixes based on
that hypothesis. Since it does not, I think the band-aid approach is warranted. A proper fix is
still on my agenda; however, getting full data rates still has priority.

Larry

  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-07 13:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-06 17:39 [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix for oops on resume Larry Finger
2007-02-06 17:39 ` Larry Finger
2007-02-07 12:15 ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-07 12:15   ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-07 13:23   ` Larry Finger [this message]
2007-02-07 13:32     ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-07 13:32       ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-07 13:50       ` Larry Finger
2007-02-07 13:50         ` Larry Finger
2007-02-07 13:54         ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-07 13:54           ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-07 13:56         ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45C9D2E1.7040906@lwfinger.net \
    --to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.