From: John <linux.kernel@free.fr>
To: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Ken Chen <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>,
balducci@units.it, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux.kernel@free.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix posix-cpu-timer breakage caused by stale p->last_ran value
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:49:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45DDC97F.7000602@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa.cIP2OCge0gIF8cSETEmZ9D2dxpE@ifi.uio.no>
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Problem description at:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8048
>
> Commit b18ec80396834497933d77b81ec0918519f4e2a7
> [PATCH] sched: improve migration accuracy
> optimized the scheduler time calculations, but broke posix-cpu-timers.
>
> The problem is that the p->last_ran value is not updated after a context
> switch. So a subsequent call to current_sched_time() calculates with a
> stale p->last_ran value, i.e. accounts the full time, which the task was
> scheduled away.
Could you expand on the impact of this bug for non-kernel hackers? :-)
I'm currently testing 2.6.20-rt5. My app runs in SCHED_RR and just
blocks waiting for several signals. Since my app is the only SCHED_RR
process running on the system, I get the impression that I'm not
affected by this bug. Is that correct?
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -3566,7 +3566,7 @@ switch_tasks:
>
> sched_info_switch(prev, next);
> if (likely(prev != next)) {
> - next->timestamp = now;
> + next->timestamp = next->last_ran = now;
> rq->nr_switches++;
> rq->curr = next;
> ++*switch_count;
Regards,
John
next parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-22 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.5d4W3Gwb5Gw7ztDfk2utJt1zgjc@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.cIP2OCge0gIF8cSETEmZ9D2dxpE@ifi.uio.no>
2007-02-22 16:49 ` John [this message]
[not found] <20070221104747.3cb0da32.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-02-22 0:33 ` [PATCH] Fix posix-cpu-timer breakage caused by stale p->last_ran value Thomas Gleixner
2007-02-22 7:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-02-22 8:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-02-22 9:16 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-01 23:45 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-03-02 0:27 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45DDC97F.7000602@free.fr \
--to=linux.kernel@free.fr \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balducci@units.it \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.