From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
To: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Re: dangerous? Setting mark in nat table
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 23:58:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45F87E06.20201@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1173910894.1760.89.camel@henriknordstrom.net>
On 14.03.2007 23:21, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Or whatever it will be in the successor to iptables..
>
> just spewing ideas at this time. As Patrick I do not consider the core
> iptables worth the effort of such redesign and if redesigning stuff then
> something significantly better should be done. nf-HiPAC is one possible
> alternative where a lot is done much smarter even if communication
> between the projects is pretty distant at the moment.
Speaking of HiPAC, when is it going to be merged? IIRC the merge was
discussed at the netfilter workshop 2005 with the goal to merge it in
2.6.16. Has this decision been overturned/revised/forgotten or was
the report I read about that netfilter workshop inaccurate?
Regards,
Carl-Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-14 22:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-13 15:25 dangerous? Setting mark in nat table Amin Azez
2007-03-13 15:36 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-03-13 16:12 ` Amin Azez
2007-03-13 16:18 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-03-14 10:35 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2007-03-14 11:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-14 12:43 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2007-03-14 12:52 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Amin Azez
2007-03-14 13:08 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-14 13:21 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2007-03-14 14:09 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2007-03-14 20:35 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-14 20:45 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2007-03-14 20:48 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-03-14 22:21 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2007-03-14 22:58 ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [this message]
2007-03-14 23:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-14 23:12 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-03-14 23:15 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-15 13:12 ` Roberto Nibali
2007-03-16 12:31 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-15 0:41 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2007-03-14 14:11 ` Amin Azez
2007-03-14 14:32 ` One unified table of nat/mangle/filter Henrik Nordstrom
2007-03-14 14:47 ` [PATCH 1/1] Re: dangerous? Setting mark in nat table Jozsef Kadlecsik
2007-03-14 16:47 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-03-14 13:14 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2007-03-14 12:43 ` Amin Azez
2007-03-14 10:27 ` Henrik Nordstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45F87E06.20201@gmx.net \
--to=c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net \
--cc=henrik@henriknordstrom.net \
--cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.