From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org,
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>,
Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Re: dangerous? Setting mark in nat table
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:15:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45F8821C.7000407@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0703150011370.1199@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Mar 15 2007 00:02, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>>Unfortunately the discussion pretty much came to a halt over a year
>>ago because of some disagreements. I still consider merging it a
>>good idea, but since there is no progress in this area I will start
>>working on a netlink based iptables replacement myself in the next
>>months.
>
>
> Does not iptables (like iproute2 and /usr/sbin/conntrack) use netlink already?
No, it has an ugly blob-passing setsockopt-based interface,
which is reponsible for a lot of the problems we have with
iptables.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-14 23:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-13 15:25 dangerous? Setting mark in nat table Amin Azez
2007-03-13 15:36 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-03-13 16:12 ` Amin Azez
2007-03-13 16:18 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-03-14 10:35 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2007-03-14 11:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-14 12:43 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2007-03-14 12:52 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Amin Azez
2007-03-14 13:08 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-14 13:21 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2007-03-14 14:09 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2007-03-14 20:35 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-14 20:45 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2007-03-14 20:48 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-03-14 22:21 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2007-03-14 22:58 ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2007-03-14 23:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-14 23:12 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-03-14 23:15 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2007-03-15 13:12 ` Roberto Nibali
2007-03-16 12:31 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-15 0:41 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2007-03-14 14:11 ` Amin Azez
2007-03-14 14:32 ` One unified table of nat/mangle/filter Henrik Nordstrom
2007-03-14 14:47 ` [PATCH 1/1] Re: dangerous? Setting mark in nat table Jozsef Kadlecsik
2007-03-14 16:47 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-03-14 13:14 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2007-03-14 12:43 ` Amin Azez
2007-03-14 10:27 ` Henrik Nordstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45F8821C.7000407@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net \
--cc=henrik@henriknordstrom.net \
--cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.