All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: gregkh@suse.de, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
	michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, shemminger@linux-foundation.org,
	mlord@pobox.com, linux-pm@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] PCI prepare/activate instead of enable to avoid IRQ storm and rogue DMA access
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:39:58 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45F8B1FE.5060406@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p73fy878pmg.fsf@bingen.suse.de>

Andi Kleen wrote:
> Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> writes:
>> Let's assume there's a device which shares its INTX IRQ line with
>> another device and the other one is already initialized.  During boot,
>> due to BIOS's fault, bad hardware design or sheer bad luck, the device
>> has got a pending IRQ.
> 
> This seems to be also common after kexec during kexec crashdumps
> where the device just continues doing what it did before the crash.
> 
>> This patch expands the pci_set_master() approach.  Instead of enabling
>> the device in one go, it's done in two steps - prepare and activate.
>> 'prepare' enables access to PCI configuration,
> 
> I hope there aren't any new erratas triggered by this. Perhaps it would
> make sense to add some paranoia sleeps at least before touching other
> state? 

Do you mean between disabling IRQ mechanisms and enabling PCI device in 
pcim_prepare_device()?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-15  2:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-14 15:23 [PATCH/RFC] PCI prepare/activate instead of enable to avoid IRQ storm and rogue DMA access Tejun Heo
2007-03-14 17:04 ` Alan Stern
2007-03-14 17:04   ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2007-03-14 17:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-14 17:07   ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-15  2:37   ` Tejun Heo
2007-03-15  6:45     ` Grant Grundler
2007-03-16 21:21     ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-14 21:46 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-15  2:39   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2007-03-15 10:17     ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-15 10:17       ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-15 11:41   ` Vivek Goyal
2007-03-14 21:56 ` Russell King
2007-03-14 22:34   ` Jeff Garzik
2007-03-14 22:58     ` Russell King
2007-03-14 23:16       ` Jeff Garzik
2007-03-15  5:47       ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45F8B1FE.5060406@gmail.com \
    --to=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
    --cc=mlord@pobox.com \
    --cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.