mime/footer stuff

mime/footer stuff

[Sven 'Darkman' Michels]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi there,

as the mime stuff just popped up again on the list, i remembered
some issues with the footer stuff. AFAIK(!) the footer is just
appended to every mail, so a mime mail gets broken or at least
the footer won't show up at all. IIRC someone was writing a patch
or stuff like that for this issue. Was this ever made? If not, why
not? I'd like to have this in mlmmj directly as the footer stuff
is something i would call important. So, if someone can refresh
my brain, please do so ;-)

Thanks and regards,
Sven
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGAcrbQoCguWUBzBwRAm55AJ0cVFpwBUnbzpdrmdEjFgPVHu3TBQCgjAh4
SZ1qBuROhidkKcfTcy1bgVA=jnwd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: mime/footer stuff

[Christoph Wilke]

Hej,

On Thu, March 22, 2007 01:16, Sven 'Darkman' Michels wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi there,
>
> as the mime stuff just popped up again on the list, i remembered
> some issues with the footer stuff. AFAIK(!) the footer is just
> appended to every mail, so a mime mail gets broken or at least
> the footer won't show up at all. IIRC someone was writing a patch
> or stuff like that for this issue. Was this ever made? If not, why
> not? I'd like to have this in mlmmj directly as the footer stuff
> is something i would call important. So, if someone can refresh
> my brain, please do so ;-)

Yep, there was one -- have a look at this link:
http://mlmmj.mmj.dk/archive/0363.html

>
> Thanks and regards,
> Sven

Ciao
Chris

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFGAcrbQoCguWUBzBwRAm55AJ0cVFpwBUnbzpdrmdEjFgPVHu3TBQCgjAh4
> SZ1qBuROhidkKcfTcy1bgVA=
> =jnwd
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

Re: mime/footer stuff

[Morten K. Poulsen]

Hi,

Sven 'Darkman' Michels <sven@darkman.de> wrote:
> as the mime stuff just popped up again on the list, i remembered
> some issues with the footer stuff. AFAIK(!) the footer is just
> appended to every mail

True.

> I'd like to have this in mlmmj directly as the footer stuff
> is something i would call important.

Why is it not good enough to have it in a mlmmj-recieve [sic]
replacement - like the one Sascha wrote?

Morten

-- 
Morten K. Poulsen <morten@afdelingp.dk>
http://www.afdelingp.dk/