All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wendy Cheng <wcheng@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] [PATCH 2/4 Revised] NLM failover - nlm_set_igrace
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:32:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4609FDF8.30005@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070328024517.GA15081@fieldses.org>

J. Bruce Fields wrote:

>On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 06:21:01PM -0400, Wendy Cheng wrote:
>  
>
>>Revised patch based on 2.6.21-rc4.
>>    
>>
>
>Were there supposed to be 4 patches?  If so, where can I find the full
>series?
>
>--b.
>  
>

These are revised patches based on the discussion we had last September 
(shame on me to put this off for so long).

General description:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2006-September/msg00034.html
Patch 4-1 is based on:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2006-September/msg00035.html
new patch at:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2007-March/msg00218.html
Patch 4-2 is based on:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2006-September/msg00036.html
new patch at:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2007-March/msg00231.html
patch 4-3 original patch on:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2006-September/msg00037.html
For 2.6.21 kernel, this patch is no longer needed.
Patch 4.4 is nfs-utils (user mode) original patch on:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2006-September/msg00038.html
New patch: to be followed.

-- Wendy



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wendy Cheng <wcheng@redhat.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4 Revised] NLM failover - nlm_set_igrace
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:32:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4609FDF8.30005@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070328024517.GA15081@fieldses.org>

J. Bruce Fields wrote:

>On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 06:21:01PM -0400, Wendy Cheng wrote:
>  
>
>>Revised patch based on 2.6.21-rc4.
>>    
>>
>
>Were there supposed to be 4 patches?  If so, where can I find the full
>series?
>
>--b.
>  
>

These are revised patches based on the discussion we had last September 
(shame on me to put this off for so long).

General description:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2006-September/msg00034.html
Patch 4-1 is based on:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2006-September/msg00035.html
new patch at:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2007-March/msg00218.html
Patch 4-2 is based on:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2006-September/msg00036.html
new patch at:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2007-March/msg00231.html
patch 4-3 original patch on:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2006-September/msg00037.html
For 2.6.21 kernel, this patch is no longer needed.
Patch 4.4 is nfs-utils (user mode) original patch on:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2006-September/msg00038.html
New patch: to be followed.

-- Wendy

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-28  5:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-14  4:44 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 1/4 Revised] NLM failover - nlm_unlock Wendy Cheng
2006-09-14  4:44 ` Wendy Cheng
     [not found] ` <message from Wendy Cheng on Thursday September 14>
2006-09-26  0:39   ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] " Neil Brown
2006-09-26  0:39     ` Neil Brown
2007-03-23 22:55     ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] " Wendy Cheng
2007-03-23 22:55       ` Wendy Cheng
2006-09-26  0:46   ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] [PATCH 2/4 Revised] NLM failover - nlm_set_igrace Neil Brown
2006-09-26  0:46     ` Neil Brown
2007-03-26 22:21     ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] " Wendy Cheng
2007-03-26 22:21       ` Wendy Cheng
2007-03-28  2:45       ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-28  2:45         ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] " J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-28  5:32         ` Wendy Cheng [this message]
2007-03-28  5:32           ` Wendy Cheng
2007-03-28 23:28           ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-28 23:28             ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] " J. Bruce Fields
2007-03-29  5:31             ` Wendy Cheng
2007-03-29  5:31               ` Wendy Cheng
2006-09-26  0:54   ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] [PATCH 3/4 Revised] NLM failover - statd changes Neil Brown
2006-09-26  0:54     ` Neil Brown
2006-09-26 13:42     ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] " Wendy Cheng
2006-09-26 13:42       ` Wendy Cheng
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-09-14  4:48 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 2/4 Revised] NLM failover - nlm_set_igrace Wendy Cheng
2006-09-14  4:48 ` Wendy Cheng
2006-09-14  4:50 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 3/4 Revised] NLM failover - statd changes Wendy Cheng
2006-09-14  4:50 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-03-27 22:46 ` [Cluster-devel] " Wendy Cheng
2007-03-27 22:46   ` Wendy Cheng
2007-03-30  7:20   ` Wendy Cheng
2007-03-30  7:25     ` Wendy Cheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4609FDF8.30005@redhat.com \
    --to=wcheng@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.