From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: getting processor numbers
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:13:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4612D175.30604@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070403141348.9bcdb13e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1905 bytes --]
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Did we mean to go off-list?
Oops, no, pressed the wrong button.
>> Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> So I'd have thought that in general an application should be querying its
>>> present affinity mask - something like sched_getaffinity()? That fixes the
>>> CPU hotplug issues too, of course.
>> Does it really?
>>
>> My recollection is that the affinity masks of running processes is not
>> updated on hotplugging. Is this addressed?
>
> ah, yes, you're correct.
>
> Inside a cpuset:
>
> sched_setaffinity() is constrained to those CPUs which are in the
> cpuset.
>
> If a cpu if on/offlined we update each cpuset's cpu mask appropriately
> but we do not update all the tasks presently running in the cpuset.
>
> Outside a cpuset:
>
> sched_setaffinity() is constrained to all possible cpus
>
> We don't update each task's cpus_allowed when a CPU is removed.
>
>
> I think we trivially _could_ update each tasks's cpus_allowed mask when a
> CPU is removed, actually.
I think it has to be done. But that's not so trivial. What happens if
all the CPUs a process was supposed to be runnable on vanish.
Shouldn't, if no affinity mask is defined, new processors be added? I
agree that if the process has a defined affinity mask no new processors
should be added _automatically_.
>> If yes, sched_getaffinity is a solution until the NUMA topology
>> framework can provide something better. Even without a popcnt
>> instruction in the CPU (64-bit albeit) it's twice as fast as the the
>> stat() method proposed.
>
> I'm surprised - I'd have expected sched_getaffinity() to be vastly quicker
> that doing fileystem operations.
You mean because it's only a factor of two? Well, it's not once you
count the whole overhead.
--
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 251 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-03 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-03 16:54 getting processor numbers Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 17:30 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2007-04-03 17:37 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 17:56 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2007-04-03 18:11 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-03 17:17 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 17:22 ` Alan Cox
2007-04-03 17:30 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-03 20:24 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-03 17:27 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-03 17:30 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 17:35 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-03 17:45 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 17:58 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-03 18:05 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 18:11 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-03 18:21 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 17:44 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-04-03 17:59 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 19:40 ` Jakub Jelinek
2007-04-03 20:13 ` Ingo Oeser
2007-04-03 23:38 ` J.A. Magallón
2007-04-03 19:55 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 20:13 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-04-03 20:19 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 20:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-03 20:20 ` Nathan Lynch
2007-04-03 19:15 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-04-03 19:32 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-04 0:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-04-04 0:35 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-04 0:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-04-04 5:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-04 5:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-04-04 5:22 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-04 5:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-04-04 5:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-04 5:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-03 20:16 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <4612BB89.8040102@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20070403141348.9bcdb13e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-04-03 22:13 ` Ulrich Drepper [this message]
2007-04-03 22:48 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-03 23:00 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 23:23 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-03 23:54 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-04 2:55 ` Paul Jackson
2007-04-04 8:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-04 9:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-04 8:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-04 10:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-04 2:58 ` Paul Jackson
2007-04-04 3:04 ` Paul Jackson
2007-04-04 2:52 ` Paul Jackson
2007-04-04 2:04 ` Paul Jackson
2007-04-04 6:47 ` Jakub Jelinek
2007-04-04 7:02 ` Paul Jackson
2007-04-04 14:51 ` Cliff Wickman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4612D175.30604@redhat.com \
--to=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.