All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Sam Edwards <cfsworks@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	"Daniel Kukieła" <daniel@kukiela.pl>,
	"Sven Rademakers" <sven.rademakers@gmail.com>,
	"Lokesh Poovaragan" <loki@gimmeapis.com>,
	"Sam Edwards" <CFSworks@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add Turing RK1 SoM support
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2023 14:59:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4613093.CvnuH1ECHv@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231007043600.151908-4-CFSworks@gmail.com>

Hi Sam,

Am Samstag, 7. Oktober 2023, 06:36:00 CEST schrieb Sam Edwards:
> The Turing RK1 is an upcoming RK3588-based SoM from Turing Machines,
> designed on the Jetson SO-DIMM form factor and meant to be compatible
> with most Jetson carrier boards (but especially the Turing Pi 2 cluster
> board from the same vendor). It has the typical I/O you'd expect from
> a Jetson board, including:
> 
> - Two UARTs (UART9 for console, UART2 is auxiliary)
> - PCI Express (2.0 x1 + 3.0 x4)
> - Gigabit Ethernet
> - On-board eMMC
> - PWM fan w/ tach
> - USB-OTG [1]
> - HDMI and MIPI DSI [1]
> - Miscellaneous external GPIO, I²C, SPI lines [1]
> 
> Beyond that, it is pretty similar to the RK3588 EVB (in terms of PMICs,
> RTC, etc).
> 
> This patch introduces a devicetree to enable most[1] of the SoM I/O.
> 
> [1] These peripherals are not addressed with this patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sam Edwards <CFSworks@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile         |   1 +
>  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-turing-rk1.dts   | 627 ++++++++++++++++++

This is more a general concern. You're introducing the rk1 as a dts file
but the from looking at the module-page and your patch description
this is "just" a SOM that most likely cannot run without some sort of carrier
board.

In the rockchip devicetree directory you can see a number of som boards
as som-dtsi + base-board forming a full product. Simply because the number
of usable peripherals will highly depend on what baseboard is used.

Thanks
Heiko



_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Sam Edwards <cfsworks@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	"Daniel Kukieła" <daniel@kukiela.pl>,
	"Sven Rademakers" <sven.rademakers@gmail.com>,
	"Lokesh Poovaragan" <loki@gimmeapis.com>,
	"Sam Edwards" <CFSworks@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add Turing RK1 SoM support
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2023 14:59:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4613093.CvnuH1ECHv@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231007043600.151908-4-CFSworks@gmail.com>

Hi Sam,

Am Samstag, 7. Oktober 2023, 06:36:00 CEST schrieb Sam Edwards:
> The Turing RK1 is an upcoming RK3588-based SoM from Turing Machines,
> designed on the Jetson SO-DIMM form factor and meant to be compatible
> with most Jetson carrier boards (but especially the Turing Pi 2 cluster
> board from the same vendor). It has the typical I/O you'd expect from
> a Jetson board, including:
> 
> - Two UARTs (UART9 for console, UART2 is auxiliary)
> - PCI Express (2.0 x1 + 3.0 x4)
> - Gigabit Ethernet
> - On-board eMMC
> - PWM fan w/ tach
> - USB-OTG [1]
> - HDMI and MIPI DSI [1]
> - Miscellaneous external GPIO, I²C, SPI lines [1]
> 
> Beyond that, it is pretty similar to the RK3588 EVB (in terms of PMICs,
> RTC, etc).
> 
> This patch introduces a devicetree to enable most[1] of the SoM I/O.
> 
> [1] These peripherals are not addressed with this patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sam Edwards <CFSworks@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile         |   1 +
>  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-turing-rk1.dts   | 627 ++++++++++++++++++

This is more a general concern. You're introducing the rk1 as a dts file
but the from looking at the module-page and your patch description
this is "just" a SOM that most likely cannot run without some sort of carrier
board.

In the rockchip devicetree directory you can see a number of som boards
as som-dtsi + base-board forming a full product. Simply because the number
of usable peripherals will highly depend on what baseboard is used.

Thanks
Heiko



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Sam Edwards <cfsworks@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	"Daniel Kukieła" <daniel@kukiela.pl>,
	"Sven Rademakers" <sven.rademakers@gmail.com>,
	"Lokesh Poovaragan" <loki@gimmeapis.com>,
	"Sam Edwards" <CFSworks@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add Turing RK1 SoM support
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2023 14:59:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4613093.CvnuH1ECHv@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231007043600.151908-4-CFSworks@gmail.com>

Hi Sam,

Am Samstag, 7. Oktober 2023, 06:36:00 CEST schrieb Sam Edwards:
> The Turing RK1 is an upcoming RK3588-based SoM from Turing Machines,
> designed on the Jetson SO-DIMM form factor and meant to be compatible
> with most Jetson carrier boards (but especially the Turing Pi 2 cluster
> board from the same vendor). It has the typical I/O you'd expect from
> a Jetson board, including:
> 
> - Two UARTs (UART9 for console, UART2 is auxiliary)
> - PCI Express (2.0 x1 + 3.0 x4)
> - Gigabit Ethernet
> - On-board eMMC
> - PWM fan w/ tach
> - USB-OTG [1]
> - HDMI and MIPI DSI [1]
> - Miscellaneous external GPIO, I²C, SPI lines [1]
> 
> Beyond that, it is pretty similar to the RK3588 EVB (in terms of PMICs,
> RTC, etc).
> 
> This patch introduces a devicetree to enable most[1] of the SoM I/O.
> 
> [1] These peripherals are not addressed with this patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sam Edwards <CFSworks@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile         |   1 +
>  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-turing-rk1.dts   | 627 ++++++++++++++++++

This is more a general concern. You're introducing the rk1 as a dts file
but the from looking at the module-page and your patch description
this is "just" a SOM that most likely cannot run without some sort of carrier
board.

In the rockchip devicetree directory you can see a number of som boards
as som-dtsi + base-board forming a full product. Simply because the number
of usable peripherals will highly depend on what baseboard is used.

Thanks
Heiko



  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-08 13:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-07  4:35 [PATCH 0/3] Add initial devicetree for Turing RK1 Sam Edwards
2023-10-07  4:35 ` Sam Edwards
2023-10-07  4:35 ` Sam Edwards
2023-10-07  4:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: add turing Sam Edwards
2023-10-07  4:35   ` Sam Edwards
2023-10-07  4:35   ` Sam Edwards
2023-10-10 14:19   ` Rob Herring
2023-10-07  4:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add Turing RK1 Sam Edwards
2023-10-07  4:35   ` Sam Edwards
2023-10-07  4:35   ` Sam Edwards
2023-10-07  4:36 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add Turing RK1 SoM support Sam Edwards
2023-10-07  4:36   ` Sam Edwards
2023-10-07  4:36   ` Sam Edwards
2023-10-08 12:59   ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2023-10-08 12:59     ` Heiko Stübner
2023-10-08 12:59     ` Heiko Stübner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4613093.CvnuH1ECHv@diego \
    --to=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=cfsworks@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel@kukiela.pl \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=loki@gimmeapis.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sven.rademakers@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.