* [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 2/4 Revised] NLM - set per fsid grace period
@ 2007-04-05 21:52 ` Wendy Cheng
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wendy Cheng @ 2007-04-05 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
This change enables per NFS-export entry lockd grace period. The
implementation is based on a double linked list fo_fsid_list that
contains entries of fsid info. It is expected this would not be a
frequent event. The fo_fsid_list is short and the entries expire within
a maximum of 50 seconds. The grace period setting follows the existing
NLM grace period handling logic and is triggered via echoing the NFS
export filesystem id into nfsd procfs entry as:
shell> echo 1234 > nlm_set_grace_for_fsid
-- Wendy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 002_nlm_grace_p.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 15230 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/attachments/20070405/253eb376/attachment.bin>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/4 Revised] NLM - set per fsid grace period
@ 2007-04-05 21:52 ` Wendy Cheng
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wendy Cheng @ 2007-04-05 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nfs, cluster-devel; +Cc: Lon Hohberger
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 517 bytes --]
This change enables per NFS-export entry lockd grace period. The
implementation is based on a double linked list fo_fsid_list that
contains entries of fsid info. It is expected this would not be a
frequent event. The fo_fsid_list is short and the entries expire within
a maximum of 50 seconds. The grace period setting follows the existing
NLM grace period handling logic and is triggered via echoing the NFS
export filesystem id into nfsd procfs entry as:
shell> echo 1234 > nlm_set_grace_for_fsid
-- Wendy
[-- Attachment #2: 002_nlm_grace_p.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 15230 bytes --]
Signed-off-by: S. Wendy Cheng <wcheng@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lon Hohberger <lhh@redhat.com>
fs/lockd/svc.c | 8 +-
fs/lockd/svc4proc.c | 15 ++-
fs/lockd/svcproc.c | 12 +--
fs/lockd/svcsubs.c | 169 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c | 27 +++++++
include/linux/lockd/bind.h | 2
include/linux/lockd/lockd.h | 30 +++++++
7 files changed, 248 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
--- linux-nlm-1/include/linux/lockd/lockd.h 2007-03-26 10:29:44.000000000 -0400
+++ linux/include/linux/lockd/lockd.h 2007-03-26 17:37:39.000000000 -0400
@@ -114,6 +114,16 @@ struct nlm_file {
struct mutex f_mutex; /* avoid concurrent access */
};
+#define NLM_FO_MAX_FSID_GP 127
+
+/* Server fsid linked list for NLM lock failover */
+struct fo_fsid {
+ struct list_head g_list; /* linked list */
+ unsigned long g_expire; /* when this grace period
+ * will expire */
+ int g_fsid; /* exported fsid */
+};
+
/*
* This is a server block (i.e. a lock requested by some client which
* couldn't be granted because of a conflicting lock).
@@ -193,6 +203,8 @@ void nlmsvc_traverse_blocks(struct nl
nlm_host_match_fn_t match);
void nlmsvc_grant_reply(struct nlm_cookie *, __be32);
+unsigned long set_grace_period(void); /*required by svcsubs.c and svc.c
+ to support nlm failover */
/*
* File handling for the server personality
*/
@@ -204,6 +216,7 @@ void nlmsvc_free_host_resources(struc
void nlmsvc_invalidate_all(void);
int nlmsvc_same_fsid(struct nlm_host *, struct nlm_host *);
int nlmsvc_fo_unlock(int *fsid);
+int nlmsvc_fo_check(struct nfs_fh *fh);
static __inline__ struct inode *
nlmsvc_file_inode(struct nlm_file *file)
@@ -234,6 +247,23 @@ nlm_compare_locks(const struct file_lock
&&(fl1->fl_type == fl2->fl_type || fl2->fl_type == F_UNLCK);
}
+extern struct list_head fo_fsid_list;
+
+/*Check for grace period: return TRUE or FALSE */
+static inline int
+nlmsvc_check_grace_period(struct nlm_args *argp)
+{
+ /* check for system wide grace period */
+ if (nlmsvc_grace_period)
+ return 1;
+
+ /* check for per exported fsid grace period */
+ if (unlikely(!list_empty(&fo_fsid_list)))
+ return(nlmsvc_fo_check(&argp->lock.fh));
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
extern struct lock_manager_operations nlmsvc_lock_operations;
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
--- linux-nlm-1/include/linux/lockd/bind.h 2007-03-26 10:29:44.000000000 -0400
+++ linux/include/linux/lockd/bind.h 2007-03-26 11:11:14.000000000 -0400
@@ -38,5 +38,7 @@ extern int nlmclnt_proc(struct inode *,
extern int lockd_up(int proto);
extern void lockd_down(void);
extern int nlmsvc_fo_unlock(int *fsid);
+extern int nlmsvc_fo_setgrace(int fsid);
+extern void nlmsvc_fo_reset_servs(void);
#endif /* LINUX_LOCKD_BIND_H */
--- linux-nlm-1/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c 2007-03-26 10:23:36.000000000 -0400
+++ linux/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c 2007-03-26 15:40:12.000000000 -0400
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ enum {
NFSD_List,
NFSD_Fh,
NFSD_NlmUnlock,
+ NFSD_NlmGrace,
NFSD_Threads,
NFSD_Pool_Threads,
NFSD_Versions,
@@ -91,6 +92,8 @@ static ssize_t write_maxblksize(struct f
static ssize_t write_leasetime(struct file *file, char *buf, size_t size);
static ssize_t write_recoverydir(struct file *file, char *buf, size_t size);
#endif
+static ssize_t write_fo_unlock(struct file *file, char *buf, size_t size);
+static ssize_t write_fo_grace(struct file *file, char *buf, size_t size);
static ssize_t (*write_op[])(struct file *, char *, size_t) = {
[NFSD_Svc] = write_svc,
@@ -102,6 +105,7 @@ static ssize_t (*write_op[])(struct file
[NFSD_Getfs] = write_getfs,
[NFSD_Fh] = write_filehandle,
[NFSD_NlmUnlock] = write_fo_unlock,
+ [NFSD_NlmGrace] = write_fo_grace,
[NFSD_Threads] = write_threads,
[NFSD_Pool_Threads] = write_pool_threads,
[NFSD_Versions] = write_versions,
@@ -372,6 +376,28 @@ static ssize_t write_fo_unlock(struct fi
return strlen(buf);
}
+static ssize_t write_fo_grace(struct file *file, char *buf, size_t size)
+{
+ char *mesg = buf;
+ int fsid, rc;
+
+ if (size <= 0) return -EINVAL;
+
+ /* convert string into a valid fsid */
+ rc = get_int(&mesg, &fsid);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ /* call nlm to set the grace period */
+ rc = nlmsvc_fo_setgrace(fsid);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ /* done */
+ sprintf(buf, "nlm set per fsid=%d grace period\n", fsid);
+ return strlen(buf);
+}
+
extern int nfsd_nrthreads(void);
static ssize_t write_threads(struct file *file, char *buf, size_t size)
@@ -676,6 +702,7 @@ static int nfsd_fill_super(struct super_
[NFSD_List] = {"exports", &exports_operations, S_IRUGO},
[NFSD_Fh] = {"filehandle", &transaction_ops, S_IWUSR|S_IRUSR},
[NFSD_NlmUnlock] = {"nlm_unlock", &transaction_ops, S_IWUSR|S_IRUSR},
+ [NFSD_NlmGrace] = {"nlm_set_grace_for_fsid", &transaction_ops, S_IWUSR|S_IRUSR},
[NFSD_Threads] = {"threads", &transaction_ops, S_IWUSR|S_IRUSR},
[NFSD_Pool_Threads] = {"pool_threads", &transaction_ops, S_IWUSR|S_IRUSR},
[NFSD_Versions] = {"versions", &transaction_ops, S_IWUSR|S_IRUSR},
--- linux-nlm-1/fs/lockd/svcsubs.c 2007-03-26 10:23:22.000000000 -0400
+++ linux/fs/lockd/svcsubs.c 2007-03-26 16:01:54.000000000 -0400
@@ -31,6 +31,13 @@
static struct hlist_head nlm_files[FILE_NRHASH];
static DEFINE_MUTEX(nlm_file_mutex);
+/*
+ * Global control structure for lock failover
+ */
+static spinlock_t nlm_fo_lock=SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
+static int fo_fsid_cnt=0;
+LIST_HEAD(fo_fsid_list);
+
#ifdef NFSD_DEBUG
static inline void nlm_debug_print_fh(char *msg, struct nfs_fh *f)
{
@@ -430,3 +437,165 @@ nlmsvc_fo_unlock(int *fsid)
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(nlmsvc_fo_setgrace);
+
+/*
+ * Add fsid into global fo_fsid_list.
+ *
+ * If this routine is repeatedly called with the same fsid, instead
+ * of searching thru the list to purge old entries (to make the code
+ * un-necessarily complicated), we will keep the old entries. Since
+ * the list is later searched in top-down order (newer entry first),
+ * as soon as one is found, the search stops. This implies the older
+ * entries will not be used and always expire before new entry.
+ *
+ * As an admin interface, the list is expected to be short and
+ * entries are purged (expired) quickly.
+ */
+int
+nlmsvc_fo_setgrace(int fsid)
+{
+ struct list_head *p, *tlist;
+ struct fo_fsid *per_fsid, *entry;
+ int done=0;
+
+ /* allocate the entry */
+ per_fsid = kmalloc(sizeof(struct fo_fsid), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (per_fsid == NULL) {
+ printk("lockd: nlmsvc_fo_setgrace kmalloc fails\n");
+ return(-ENOMEM);
+ }
+
+ /* debug printk */
+ dprintk("lockd: nlmsvc_fo_setgrace fsid=%d jiffies=%lu\n",
+ fsid, jiffies);
+
+ /* fill in info */
+ per_fsid->g_expire = set_grace_period();
+ per_fsid->g_fsid = fsid;
+
+ spin_lock(&nlm_fo_lock);
+
+ if (list_empty(&fo_fsid_list)) {
+ list_add(&per_fsid->g_list, &fo_fsid_list);
+ fo_fsid_cnt = 1;
+ done = 1;
+ goto nlmsvc_fo_setgrace_out;
+ } else if (fo_fsid_cnt > NLM_FO_MAX_FSID_GP) {
+ kfree(per_fsid);
+ printk("lockd: fo_setgrace max cnt reached fsid=%d not added\n", fsid);
+ goto nlmsvc_fo_setgrace_out;
+ }
+
+ list_for_each_safe(p, tlist, &fo_fsid_list) {
+ entry = list_entry(p, struct fo_fsid, g_list);
+ if (!done) {
+ /* add the new fsid into the list */
+ if (entry->g_expire <= per_fsid->g_expire) {
+ list_add(&per_fsid->g_list, &entry->g_list);
+ fo_fsid_cnt++;
+ done = 1;
+ }
+ }
+ if (done && (entry->g_fsid == fsid)) {
+ /* multiple fsid(s) */
+ BUG_ON(entry->g_expire > per_fsid->g_expire);
+ list_del(p);
+ fo_fsid_cnt--;
+ kfree(entry);
+ } else if (time_before(entry->g_expire, jiffies)) {
+ /* garbage collection */
+ dprintk("nlmsvc fo_fsid = %d expires\n", entry->g_fsid);
+ list_del(p);
+ fo_fsid_cnt--;
+ kfree(entry);
+ }
+ }
+
+nlmsvc_fo_setgrace_out:
+
+ spin_unlock(&nlm_fo_lock);
+
+ /* debug */
+ if (done)
+ dprintk("nlmsvc fo setgrace: fsid=%d, jiffies=%lu, expire=%lu\n",
+ per_fsid->g_fsid, jiffies, per_fsid->g_expire);
+ else
+ dprintk("nlmsvc_fo_setgrace: adding fsid=%d fails\n", fsid);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Reset global fo_fsid_list list
+ */
+void
+nlmsvc_fo_reset_servs()
+{
+ struct fo_fsid *e_purge;
+ struct list_head *p, *tlist;
+
+ spin_lock(&nlm_fo_lock);
+
+ /* nothing to do */
+ if (list_empty(&fo_fsid_list)) {
+ spin_unlock(&nlm_fo_lock);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ dprintk("lockd: nlmsvc_fo_reset fo_fsid_list\n");
+
+ /* purge the entries */
+ list_for_each_safe(p, tlist, &fo_fsid_list) {
+ e_purge = list_entry(p, struct fo_fsid, g_list);
+ list_del(p);
+ kfree(e_purge);
+ }
+ fo_fsid_cnt = 0;
+
+ spin_unlock(&nlm_fo_lock);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Check whether the fsid is in the failover list: fo_fsid_list.
+ * return TRUE (1) if fsid in nlm_serv.
+ */
+int
+nlmsvc_fo_check(struct nfs_fh *fh)
+{
+ struct fo_fsid *e_this;
+ struct list_head *p, *tlist;
+ int rc=0, this_fsid;
+
+ /* see if this fh has fsid */
+ if (!get_fsid(fh, &this_fsid)) {
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ spin_lock(&nlm_fo_lock);
+
+ /* no failover entry */
+ if (list_empty(&fo_fsid_list))
+ goto nlmsvc_fo_check_out;
+
+ /* check to see whether this_fsid is in fo_fsid_list list */
+ list_for_each_safe(p, tlist, &fo_fsid_list) {
+ e_this = list_entry(p, struct fo_fsid, g_list);
+ if (time_before(e_this->g_expire, jiffies)) {
+ printk("lockd: fsid=%d grace period expires\n",
+ e_this->g_fsid);
+ list_del(p);
+ fo_fsid_cnt--;
+ kfree(e_this);
+ } else if (e_this->g_fsid == this_fsid) {
+ printk("lockd: fsid=%d in grace period\n",
+ e_this->g_fsid);
+ rc = 1;
+ }
+ }
+
+nlmsvc_fo_check_out:
+ spin_unlock(&nlm_fo_lock);
+ return rc;
+}
+
--- linux-nlm-1/fs/lockd/svc4proc.c 2007-03-26 10:23:22.000000000 -0400
+++ linux/fs/lockd/svc4proc.c 2007-03-26 17:34:27.000000000 -0400
@@ -18,9 +18,10 @@
#include <linux/lockd/share.h>
#include <linux/lockd/sm_inter.h>
-
#define NLMDBG_FACILITY NLMDBG_CLIENT
+extern struct list_head fo_fsid_list;
+
/*
* Obtain client and file from arguments
*/
@@ -89,7 +90,7 @@ nlm4svc_proc_test(struct svc_rqst *rqstp
resp->cookie = argp->cookie;
/* Don't accept test requests during grace period */
- if (nlmsvc_grace_period) {
+ if (nlmsvc_check_grace_period(argp)) {
resp->status = nlm_lck_denied_grace_period;
return rpc_success;
}
@@ -119,7 +120,7 @@ nlm4svc_proc_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp
resp->cookie = argp->cookie;
/* Don't accept new lock requests during grace period */
- if (nlmsvc_grace_period && !argp->reclaim) {
+ if (nlmsvc_check_grace_period(argp) && !argp->reclaim) {
resp->status = nlm_lck_denied_grace_period;
return rpc_success;
}
@@ -162,7 +163,7 @@ nlm4svc_proc_cancel(struct svc_rqst *rqs
resp->cookie = argp->cookie;
/* Don't accept requests during grace period */
- if (nlmsvc_grace_period) {
+ if (nlmsvc_check_grace_period(argp)) {
resp->status = nlm_lck_denied_grace_period;
return rpc_success;
}
@@ -195,7 +196,7 @@ nlm4svc_proc_unlock(struct svc_rqst *rqs
resp->cookie = argp->cookie;
/* Don't accept new lock requests during grace period */
- if (nlmsvc_grace_period) {
+ if (nlmsvc_check_grace_period(argp)) {
resp->status = nlm_lck_denied_grace_period;
return rpc_success;
}
@@ -332,7 +333,7 @@ nlm4svc_proc_share(struct svc_rqst *rqst
resp->cookie = argp->cookie;
/* Don't accept new lock requests during grace period */
- if (nlmsvc_grace_period && !argp->reclaim) {
+ if (nlmsvc_check_grace_period(argp) && !argp->reclaim) {
resp->status = nlm_lck_denied_grace_period;
return rpc_success;
}
@@ -365,7 +366,7 @@ nlm4svc_proc_unshare(struct svc_rqst *rq
resp->cookie = argp->cookie;
/* Don't accept requests during grace period */
- if (nlmsvc_grace_period) {
+ if (nlmsvc_check_grace_period(argp)) {
resp->status = nlm_lck_denied_grace_period;
return rpc_success;
}
--- linux-nlm-1/fs/lockd/svcproc.c 2007-03-26 10:23:23.000000000 -0400
+++ linux/fs/lockd/svcproc.c 2007-03-26 17:37:30.000000000 -0400
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ nlmsvc_proc_test(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
resp->cookie = argp->cookie;
/* Don't accept test requests during grace period */
- if (nlmsvc_grace_period) {
+ if (nlmsvc_check_grace_period(argp)) {
resp->status = nlm_lck_denied_grace_period;
return rpc_success;
}
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ nlmsvc_proc_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
resp->cookie = argp->cookie;
/* Don't accept new lock requests during grace period */
- if (nlmsvc_grace_period && !argp->reclaim) {
+ if (nlmsvc_check_grace_period(argp) && !argp->reclaim) {
resp->status = nlm_lck_denied_grace_period;
return rpc_success;
}
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ nlmsvc_proc_cancel(struct svc_rqst *rqst
resp->cookie = argp->cookie;
/* Don't accept requests during grace period */
- if (nlmsvc_grace_period) {
+ if (nlmsvc_check_grace_period(argp)) {
resp->status = nlm_lck_denied_grace_period;
return rpc_success;
}
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ nlmsvc_proc_unlock(struct svc_rqst *rqst
resp->cookie = argp->cookie;
/* Don't accept new lock requests during grace period */
- if (nlmsvc_grace_period) {
+ if (nlmsvc_check_grace_period(argp)) {
resp->status = nlm_lck_denied_grace_period;
return rpc_success;
}
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ nlmsvc_proc_share(struct svc_rqst *rqstp
resp->cookie = argp->cookie;
/* Don't accept new lock requests during grace period */
- if (nlmsvc_grace_period && !argp->reclaim) {
+ if (nlmsvc_check_grace_period(argp) && !argp->reclaim) {
resp->status = nlm_lck_denied_grace_period;
return rpc_success;
}
@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ nlmsvc_proc_unshare(struct svc_rqst *rqs
resp->cookie = argp->cookie;
/* Don't accept requests during grace period */
- if (nlmsvc_grace_period) {
+ if (nlmsvc_check_grace_period(argp)) {
resp->status = nlm_lck_denied_grace_period;
return rpc_success;
}
--- linux-nlm-1/fs/lockd/svc.c 2007-03-26 10:23:22.000000000 -0400
+++ linux/fs/lockd/svc.c 2007-03-26 11:16:27.000000000 -0400
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static const int nlm_port_min = 0, nlm_
static struct ctl_table_header * nlm_sysctl_table;
-static unsigned long set_grace_period(void)
+unsigned long set_grace_period(void)
{
unsigned long grace_period;
@@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static unsigned long set_grace_period(vo
/ nlm_timeout) * nlm_timeout * HZ;
else
grace_period = nlm_timeout * 5 * HZ;
- nlmsvc_grace_period = 1;
return grace_period + jiffies;
}
@@ -133,6 +132,8 @@ lockd(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
nlmsvc_timeout = nlm_timeout * HZ;
grace_period_expire = set_grace_period();
+ nlmsvc_grace_period = 1;
+ (void) nlmsvc_fo_reset_servs();
/*
* The main request loop. We don't terminate until the last
@@ -148,6 +149,8 @@ lockd(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
if (nlmsvc_ops) {
nlmsvc_invalidate_all();
grace_period_expire = set_grace_period();
+ nlmsvc_grace_period = 1;
+ (void) nlmsvc_fo_reset_servs();
}
}
@@ -194,6 +197,7 @@ lockd(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
nlm_shutdown_hosts();
nlmsvc_pid = 0;
nlmsvc_serv = NULL;
+ (void) nlmsvc_fo_reset_servs();
} else
printk(KERN_DEBUG
"lockd: new process, skipping host shutdown\n");
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 345 bytes --]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
[-- Attachment #4: Type: text/plain, Size: 140 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/4 Revised] NLM - set per fsid grace period
2007-04-05 21:52 ` Wendy Cheng
@ 2007-04-10 8:57 ` Olaf Kirch
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Olaf Kirch @ 2007-04-10 8:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nfs; +Cc: cluster-devel, Lon Hohberger
On Thursday 05 April 2007 23:52, Wendy Cheng wrote:
> This change enables per NFS-export entry lockd grace period. The
> implementation is based on a double linked list fo_fsid_list that
> contains entries of fsid info. It is expected this would not be a
> frequent event. The fo_fsid_list is short and the entries expire within
> a maximum of 50 seconds. The grace period setting follows the existing
> NLM grace period handling logic and is triggered via echoing the NFS
> export filesystem id into nfsd procfs entry as:
Your patch creates a new per-export structure that is private to lockd.
It may be easier to put the grace period value into the export entry,
and check for that in nlm_fopen. It feels more natural than adding
a whole new shadow export table just for the benefit of lockd.
(Especially when you consider future extensions like being able
to search the list by dev_t or uuid or whatever)
Olaf
--
Olaf Kirch | --- o --- Nous sommes du soleil we love when we play
okir@lst.de | / | \ sol.dhoop.naytheet.ah kin.ir.samse.qurax
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] [PATCH 2/4 Revised] NLM - set per fsid grace period
@ 2007-04-10 8:57 ` Olaf Kirch
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Olaf Kirch @ 2007-04-10 8:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
On Thursday 05 April 2007 23:52, Wendy Cheng wrote:
> This change enables per NFS-export entry lockd grace period. The
> implementation is based on a double linked list fo_fsid_list that
> contains entries of fsid info. It is expected this would not be a
> frequent event. The fo_fsid_list is short and the entries expire within
> a maximum of 50 seconds. The grace period setting follows the existing
> NLM grace period handling logic and is triggered via echoing the NFS
> export filesystem id into nfsd procfs entry as:
Your patch creates a new per-export structure that is private to lockd.
It may be easier to put the grace period value into the export entry,
and check for that in nlm_fopen. It feels more natural than adding
a whole new shadow export table just for the benefit of lockd.
(Especially when you consider future extensions like being able
to search the list by dev_t or uuid or whatever)
Olaf
--
Olaf Kirch | --- o --- Nous sommes du soleil we love when we play
okir at lst.de | / | \ sol.dhoop.naytheet.ah kin.ir.samse.qurax
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] [PATCH 2/4 Revised] NLM - set per fsid grace period
2007-04-10 8:57 ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] " Olaf Kirch
@ 2007-04-10 14:37 ` Wendy Cheng
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wendy Cheng @ 2007-04-10 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Olaf Kirch wrote:
> On Thursday 05 April 2007 23:52, Wendy Cheng wrote:
>
>> This change enables per NFS-export entry lockd grace period. The
>> implementation is based on a double linked list fo_fsid_list that
>> contains entries of fsid info. It is expected this would not be a
>> frequent event. The fo_fsid_list is short and the entries expire within
>> a maximum of 50 seconds. The grace period setting follows the existing
>> NLM grace period handling logic and is triggered via echoing the NFS
>> export filesystem id into nfsd procfs entry as:
>>
>
> Your patch creates a new per-export structure that is private to lockd.
> It may be easier to put the grace period value into the export entry,
> and check for that in nlm_fopen. It feels more natural than adding
> a whole new shadow export table just for the benefit of lockd.
> (Especially when you consider future extensions like being able
> to search the list by dev_t or uuid or whatever)
>
I'm traveling so may not be able to do intelligent responses until next
Monday.
However, I should have made it clear that these patches are minimum
changes to keep NFS V3 failover going due to large amount of existing
installations and users. The real efforts and future enhancements should
be placed on NFS V4. That's the reason most of the code in this patch
set are stand-alone addition and I have been trying not to mingle the
changes with main-line nfsd-lockd code.
Ideally we would like to avoid this grace period eventually if we can
(by transferring the locks from one server to another server without NFS
clients' involvement).
-- Wendy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/4 Revised] NLM - set per fsid grace period
@ 2007-04-10 14:37 ` Wendy Cheng
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wendy Cheng @ 2007-04-10 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Olaf Kirch; +Cc: cluster-devel, Lon Hohberger, nfs
Olaf Kirch wrote:
> On Thursday 05 April 2007 23:52, Wendy Cheng wrote:
>
>> This change enables per NFS-export entry lockd grace period. The
>> implementation is based on a double linked list fo_fsid_list that
>> contains entries of fsid info. It is expected this would not be a
>> frequent event. The fo_fsid_list is short and the entries expire within
>> a maximum of 50 seconds. The grace period setting follows the existing
>> NLM grace period handling logic and is triggered via echoing the NFS
>> export filesystem id into nfsd procfs entry as:
>>
>
> Your patch creates a new per-export structure that is private to lockd.
> It may be easier to put the grace period value into the export entry,
> and check for that in nlm_fopen. It feels more natural than adding
> a whole new shadow export table just for the benefit of lockd.
> (Especially when you consider future extensions like being able
> to search the list by dev_t or uuid or whatever)
>
I'm traveling so may not be able to do intelligent responses until next
Monday.
However, I should have made it clear that these patches are minimum
changes to keep NFS V3 failover going due to large amount of existing
installations and users. The real efforts and future enhancements should
be placed on NFS V4. That's the reason most of the code in this patch
set are stand-alone addition and I have been trying not to mingle the
changes with main-line nfsd-lockd code.
Ideally we would like to avoid this grace period eventually if we can
(by transferring the locks from one server to another server without NFS
clients' involvement).
-- Wendy
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-04-10 14:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-04-05 21:52 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 2/4 Revised] NLM - set per fsid grace period Wendy Cheng
2007-04-05 21:52 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-10 8:57 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-04-10 8:57 ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] " Olaf Kirch
2007-04-10 14:37 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-10 14:37 ` Wendy Cheng
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.