From: Wendy Cheng <wcheng@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] [PATCH 3/4 Revised] NLM - kernel lockd-statd changes
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:31:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <461FDA77.5080009@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070413191615.GU1804@redhat.com>
Lon Hohberger wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 02:50:04PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
>
>> lockd knows which is which either based on the destination network
>> address of the lock request, or the filesystem on which the lock was
>> taken. Somehow this information needs to get communicated to statd
>> so that different 'sm' directories can be used. my_name seems a
>> sensible place to put the information.
>>
>
> Right. Using the inbound-destination address instead of fsid or file
> system will ensure the right address is used for sending the SM_NOTIFY
> requests. However, fsid, or export path - on a service with more than
> one network address will not, I think...
>
So I think we conclude here that inbound-destination address is required
for SM_NOTIFY purpose.
Thanks for all the comments. Will summarize the issues on Monday and see
what we should go from there.
-- Wendy
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wendy Cheng <wcheng@redhat.com>
To: Lon Hohberger <lhh@redhat.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
cluster-devel@redhat.com, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4 Revised] NLM - kernel lockd-statd changes
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:31:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <461FDA77.5080009@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070413191615.GU1804@redhat.com>
Lon Hohberger wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 02:50:04PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
>
>> lockd knows which is which either based on the destination network
>> address of the lock request, or the filesystem on which the lock was
>> taken. Somehow this information needs to get communicated to statd
>> so that different 'sm' directories can be used. my_name seems a
>> sensible place to put the information.
>>
>
> Right. Using the inbound-destination address instead of fsid or file
> system will ensure the right address is used for sending the SM_NOTIFY
> requests. However, fsid, or export path - on a service with more than
> one network address will not, I think...
>
So I think we conclude here that inbound-destination address is required
for SM_NOTIFY purpose.
Thanks for all the comments. Will summarize the issues on Monday and see
what we should go from there.
-- Wendy
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-13 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-05 21:52 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 3/4 Revised] NLM - kernel lockd-statd changes Wendy Cheng
2007-04-05 21:52 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-10 9:09 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-04-10 9:10 ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] " Olaf Kirch
2007-04-10 14:41 ` Lon Hohberger
2007-04-10 14:41 ` Lon Hohberger
2007-04-10 15:00 ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] " Wendy Cheng
2007-04-10 15:00 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-10 18:16 ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] " Wendy Cheng
2007-04-10 18:16 ` Wendy Cheng
[not found] ` <message from Olaf Kirch on Tuesday April 10>
2007-04-11 4:50 ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] " Neil Brown
2007-04-11 4:50 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-13 19:16 ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] " Lon Hohberger
2007-04-13 19:16 ` Lon Hohberger
2007-04-13 19:31 ` Wendy Cheng [this message]
2007-04-13 19:31 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-17 11:52 ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] " Olaf Kirch
2007-04-17 11:52 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-04-17 13:24 ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] " Wendy Cheng
2007-04-17 13:24 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-17 14:51 ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] " Olaf Kirch
2007-04-17 14:51 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-04-17 15:09 ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] " Wendy Cheng
2007-04-17 15:09 ` Wendy Cheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=461FDA77.5080009@redhat.com \
--to=wcheng@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.