From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@gmail.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Merge plans for RPC/RDMA? (Was: Re: [PATCH 000 of 14] knfsd: Preparation for IPv6 support in NFS server.)
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:45:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46200822.5060800@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <170fa0d20704131347u4a28b5d1h1959227980449fbf@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1518 bytes --]
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On 2/2/07, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:
>> Roland Dreier wrote:
>> > > They are mostly from Chuck Level and make preparating for IPv6
>> support
>> > > in the NFS server.
>> > > They are *not* for 2.6.20, but should be ok for .21.
>> >
>> > Out of curiousity, does this patch series reduce the delta between the
>> > NFS/RDMA tree and mainline Linux? In other words does this bring
>> > NFS/RDMA closer to merging?
>>
>> Hi Roland-
>>
>> The client side support for an RPC/RDMA module is almost completely
>> integrated into mainline. There is still a minimal set of patches
>> required to support alternate transports in loadable kernel modules
>> which Trond has indicated he will integrate when the RPC/RDMA transport
>> is ready to be integrated.
>
> Hi Chuck,
>
> I must be missing something because I don't see _any_ trace of the
> core RPC over RDMA support (xprtrdma et al), your RPC Transport
> Switch, or any of the other supporting changes in mainline. Could
> you, or others, please clarify the plan for merging RPC/RDMA?
The RPC transport switch patches are almost fully integrated into
mainline. The xprtrdma piece is what is not there yet.
>> At this time I'm not aware of a plan to integrate server-side support
>> for NFS/RDMA. Perhaps the NetApp RDMA developers could respond.
>
> Do you mean the NFS/RDMA server code from Tom Tucker of Open Grid
> Computing? Why wouldn't this code be included?
Tom's code hasn't been reviewed by the community.
[-- Attachment #2: chuck.lever.vcf --]
[-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 315 bytes --]
begin:vcard
fn:Chuck Lever
n:Lever;Chuck
org:Oracle Corporation;Corporate Architecture: Linux Projects Group
adr:;;1015 Granger Avenue;Ann Arbor;MI;48104;USA
email;internet:chuck dot lever at nospam oracle dot com
title:Principal Member of Staff
tel;work:+1 248 614 5091
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 345 bytes --]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
[-- Attachment #4: Type: text/plain, Size: 140 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@gmail.com>
Cc: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Merge plans for RPC/RDMA? (Was: Re: [NFS] [PATCH 000 of 14] knfsd: Preparation for IPv6 support in NFS server.)
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:45:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46200822.5060800@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <170fa0d20704131347u4a28b5d1h1959227980449fbf@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1518 bytes --]
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On 2/2/07, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:
>> Roland Dreier wrote:
>> > > They are mostly from Chuck Level and make preparating for IPv6
>> support
>> > > in the NFS server.
>> > > They are *not* for 2.6.20, but should be ok for .21.
>> >
>> > Out of curiousity, does this patch series reduce the delta between the
>> > NFS/RDMA tree and mainline Linux? In other words does this bring
>> > NFS/RDMA closer to merging?
>>
>> Hi Roland-
>>
>> The client side support for an RPC/RDMA module is almost completely
>> integrated into mainline. There is still a minimal set of patches
>> required to support alternate transports in loadable kernel modules
>> which Trond has indicated he will integrate when the RPC/RDMA transport
>> is ready to be integrated.
>
> Hi Chuck,
>
> I must be missing something because I don't see _any_ trace of the
> core RPC over RDMA support (xprtrdma et al), your RPC Transport
> Switch, or any of the other supporting changes in mainline. Could
> you, or others, please clarify the plan for merging RPC/RDMA?
The RPC transport switch patches are almost fully integrated into
mainline. The xprtrdma piece is what is not there yet.
>> At this time I'm not aware of a plan to integrate server-side support
>> for NFS/RDMA. Perhaps the NetApp RDMA developers could respond.
>
> Do you mean the NFS/RDMA server code from Tom Tucker of Open Grid
> Computing? Why wouldn't this code be included?
Tom's code hasn't been reviewed by the community.
[-- Attachment #2: chuck.lever.vcf --]
[-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 315 bytes --]
begin:vcard
fn:Chuck Lever
n:Lever;Chuck
org:Oracle Corporation;Corporate Architecture: Linux Projects Group
adr:;;1015 Granger Avenue;Ann Arbor;MI;48104;USA
email;internet:chuck dot lever at nospam oracle dot com
title:Principal Member of Staff
tel;work:+1 248 614 5091
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-13 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-13 20:47 Merge plans for RPC/RDMA? (Was: Re: [PATCH 000 of 14] knfsd: Preparation for IPv6 support in NFS server.) Mike Snitzer
2007-04-13 20:47 ` Merge plans for RPC/RDMA? (Was: Re: [NFS] " Mike Snitzer
2007-04-13 22:14 ` Merge plans for RPC/RDMA? (Was: " Trond Myklebust
2007-04-13 22:14 ` [NFS] " Trond Myklebust
2007-04-15 3:40 ` Mike Snitzer
2007-04-16 14:13 ` James Lentini
2007-04-16 14:48 ` Mike Snitzer
2007-04-13 22:45 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2007-04-13 22:45 ` Merge plans for RPC/RDMA? (Was: Re: [NFS] " Chuck Lever
2007-04-14 0:04 ` Mike Snitzer
2007-04-14 1:07 ` Merge plans for RPC/RDMA? (Was: " Chuck Lever
2007-04-14 1:07 ` Merge plans for RPC/RDMA? (Was: Re: [NFS] " Chuck Lever
2007-04-14 1:14 ` Merge plans for RPC/RDMA? (Was: " Chuck Lever
2007-04-14 1:14 ` Merge plans for RPC/RDMA? (Was: Re: [NFS] " Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46200822.5060800@oracle.com \
--to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=snitzer@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.