* Running Glibc Testsuite - Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative!
@ 2007-04-14 16:01 Jim Gifford
2007-04-14 17:04 ` Running Glibc Testsuite - Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went David Miller
2007-04-14 17:11 ` Running Glibc Testsuite - Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! Jim Gifford
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jim Gifford @ 2007-04-14 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sparclinux
I was compiling glibc like I have done several times before, but the
last 3 times with the 2.6.20.x series of kernel when the testsuite runs
I get the following error. I've seen this issue reported on LKML but no
fixes. I'm compiling on a Netra T1.
Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)
page pfn = 0
page->flags = 400
page->count = 1
page->mapping = 0000000000000000
vma->vm_ops = 0x8
Kernel bad sw trap 5 [#1]
TSTATE: 0000000011009600 TPC: 0000000000481574 TNPC: 0000000000481578 Y:
00000000 Not tainted
TPC: <page_remove_rmap+0x1dc/0x1e0>
g0: 000000000a94c57d g1: 0000000000000000 g2: 0000000000000001 g3:
00000000006cbac0
g4: fffff80037826a40 g5: 0000000000202464 g6: fffff80033e50000 g7:
0000000000000000
o0: 0000000000000020 o1: 0000000000686dd0 o2: 000000000000024c o3:
00000000006b87a8
o4: 00000000006b87e8 o5: fffff80000648d70 sp: fffff80033e52f71 ret_pc:
000000000048156c
RPC: <page_remove_rmap+0x1d4/0x1e0>
l0: 0009000000000000 l1: 00000000006b87a8 l2: 00000000006b87d8 l3:
0000000000000000
l4: 0000000000000000 l5: 0000000000000000 l6: 0000000000000000 l7:
0000000011009000
i0: fffff80000360000 i1: 0000000000000000 i2: 000c000000000080 i3:
000000000071bc00
i4: 0000000000000000 i5: ffffffffffffffff i6: fffff80033e53031 i7:
000000000047a264
I7: <unmap_vmas+0x3ac/0x6c0>
Caller[000000000047a264]: unmap_vmas+0x3ac/0x6c0
Caller[000000000047e044]: exit_mmap+0x6c/0x160
Caller[000000000044846c]: mmput+0x34/0xc04
Caller[000000000044d6f0]: do_exit+0x118/0x940
Caller[000000000044df78]: do_group_exit+0x60/0xa0e
Caller[00000000004578bc]: get_signal_to_deliver+0x2a4/0x380
Caller[0000000000420fe4]: do_notify_resume+0x4c/0x580
Caller[000000000040531c]: __handle_signal+0x18/0x34b
Caller[fffff8012808ebd0]: 0xfffff8012808ebd8
Instruction DUMP:9210224c 7ffe64ed 901221d0 <91d02005> 106fffdc c65e2010
9de3bf30 c25e2020 a4100018
Fixing recursive fault but reboot is needed!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Running Glibc Testsuite - Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went
2007-04-14 16:01 Running Glibc Testsuite - Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! Jim Gifford
@ 2007-04-14 17:04 ` David Miller
2007-04-14 17:11 ` Running Glibc Testsuite - Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! Jim Gifford
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2007-04-14 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sparclinux
From: Jim Gifford <maillist@jg555.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 09:01:45 -0700
> I was compiling glibc like I have done several times before, but the
> last 3 times with the 2.6.20.x series of kernel when the testsuite runs
> I get the following error. I've seen this issue reported on LKML but no
> fixes. I'm compiling on a Netra T1.
>
> Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)
> page pfn = 0
> page->flags = 400
> page->count = 1
> page->mapping = 0000000000000000
> vma->vm_ops = 0x8
Can you point me at one of the LKML reports that look like this
one? Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Running Glibc Testsuite - Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative!
2007-04-14 16:01 Running Glibc Testsuite - Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! Jim Gifford
2007-04-14 17:04 ` Running Glibc Testsuite - Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went David Miller
@ 2007-04-14 17:11 ` Jim Gifford
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jim Gifford @ 2007-04-14 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sparclinux
David Miller wrote:
> From: Jim Gifford <maillist@jg555.com>
> Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 09:01:45 -0700
>
>
>> I was compiling glibc like I have done several times before, but the
>> last 3 times with the 2.6.20.x series of kernel when the testsuite runs
>> I get the following error. I've seen this issue reported on LKML but no
>> fixes. I'm compiling on a Netra T1.
>>
>> Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)
>> page pfn = 0
>> page->flags = 400
>> page->count = 1
>> page->mapping = 0000000000000000
>> vma->vm_ops = 0x8
>>
>
> Can you point me at one of the LKML reports that look like this
> one? Thanks.
>
http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0701.1/0979.html
http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2007/01/07/162
http://hulllug.principalhosting.net/archive/index.php/t-226829.html
http://www.linuxrocket.net/index.cgi?a=MailArchiver&ma=ShowMail&IdF8815
These are the ones I found, looks like one of them is pretty old.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-04-14 17:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-04-14 16:01 Running Glibc Testsuite - Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! Jim Gifford
2007-04-14 17:04 ` Running Glibc Testsuite - Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went David Miller
2007-04-14 17:11 ` Running Glibc Testsuite - Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! Jim Gifford
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.