* No sensors found
2005-05-19 6:24 No sensors found Herbert G. Fischer
@ 2005-05-19 6:24 ` Herbert G. Fischer
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Herbert G. Fischer @ 2005-05-19 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Sorry... I apologise...
I found a tip on kernel 2.6 info to unload i2c-viapro and use i2c-isa with
via686a
and now it worked.
Thanks for this great software!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Herbert G. Fischer" <herbert@mamute.net>
To: <sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2004 2:13 PM
Subject: No sensors found
> Hi,
>
> I'm having problem to get sensors from a Soyo K7VTA Pro motherboard.
> Attached are the output from the commands of "5.1 What to send us when
> asking for help".
> Attached is the config of my kernel too.
>
> The kernel is 2.6.5, lm_sensors 2.8.6.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Herbert G. Fischer
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* No sensors found
2005-05-19 6:24 No sensors found Herbert G. Fischer
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Herbert G. Fischer
@ 2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Herbert G. Fischer
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2005-05-19 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
> I've already did this.
>
> The problem is that prog/rrd/* doesn't recognise the kernel 2.6
> change.
>
> I'm did some hardcoded paths in there.
Correct. If you can update it so that it works for 2.6 (while still
maintaining compatibility with 2.4), please contribute back.
Thanks.
--
Jean Delvare
http://khali.linux-fr.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* No sensors found
2005-05-19 6:24 No sensors found Herbert G. Fischer
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Herbert G. Fischer
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2005-05-19 6:24 ` Herbert G. Fischer
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Herbert G. Fischer @ 2005-05-19 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
I've already did this.
The problem is that prog/rrd/* doesn't recognise the kernel 2.6 change.
I'm did some hardcoded paths in there.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jean Delvare" <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: "Herbert G. Fischer" <herbert@mamute.net>
Cc: <sensors@Stimpy.netroedge.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2004 2:48 PM
Subject: Re: No sensors found
> > Just a problem now..
> >
> > I don't have the dir "/proc/sys/dev/sensors/" on my running linux.
> >
> > Neither some dir with the name sensors on /proc ou /sys
>
> As root:
> mkdir /sys
> mount none /sys -t sysfs
>
> If you want that done automatically, make sure that to have the
> following line in /etc/fstab:
> none /sys sysfs defaults 0 0
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> --
> Jean Delvare
> http://khali.linux-fr.org/
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* No sensors found
2005-05-19 6:24 No sensors found Herbert G. Fischer
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Herbert G. Fischer
@ 2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Herbert G. Fischer
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2005-05-19 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
> Just a problem now..
>
> I don't have the dir "/proc/sys/dev/sensors/" on my running linux.
>
> Neither some dir with the name sensors on /proc ou /sys
As root:
mkdir /sys
mount none /sys -t sysfs
If you want that done automatically, make sure that to have the
following line in /etc/fstab:
none /sys sysfs defaults 0 0
Hope that helps.
--
Jean Delvare
http://khali.linux-fr.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* No sensors found
2005-05-19 6:24 No sensors found Herbert G. Fischer
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2005-05-19 6:24 ` Herbert G. Fischer
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Fw: " Herbert G. Fischer
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Herbert G. Fischer @ 2005-05-19 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
By now I'm doing it as hardcoded for my computer.
If I have time on the future, I'll do-it.
Thanks
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jean Delvare" <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: "Herbert G. Fischer" <herbert@mamute.net>
Cc: <sensors@Stimpy.netroedge.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2004 3:20 PM
Subject: Re: No sensors found
> > I've already did this.
> >
> > The problem is that prog/rrd/* doesn't recognise the kernel 2.6
> > change.
> >
> > I'm did some hardcoded paths in there.
>
> Correct. If you can update it so that it works for 2.6 (while still
> maintaining compatibility with 2.4), please contribute back.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Jean Delvare
> http://khali.linux-fr.org/
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Fw: No sensors found
2005-05-19 6:24 No sensors found Herbert G. Fischer
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Herbert G. Fischer
@ 2005-05-19 6:24 ` Herbert G. Fischer
2007-04-16 8:30 ` [lm-sensors] no " Mike Cornelison
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Herbert G. Fischer @ 2005-05-19 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Just a problem now..
I don't have the dir "/proc/sys/dev/sensors/" on my running linux.
Neither some dir with the name sensors on /proc ou /sys
----- Original Message -----
From: "Herbert G. Fischer" <herbert@mamute.net>
To: <sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2004 2:13 PM
Subject: No sensors found
> Hi,
>
> I'm having problem to get sensors from a Soyo K7VTA Pro motherboard.
> Attached are the output from the commands of "5.1 What to send us when
> asking for help".
> Attached is the config of my kernel too.
>
> The kernel is 2.6.5, lm_sensors 2.8.6.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Herbert G. Fischer
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: dmesg.out
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 8199 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20040502/4c29c3af/dmesg.obj
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: i2cdetect0.out
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 476 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20040502/4c29c3af/i2cdetect0.obj
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: i2cdetect1.out
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 476 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20040502/4c29c3af/i2cdetect1.obj
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: i2cdetect2.out
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 476 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20040502/4c29c3af/i2cdetect2.obj
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: i2cdetect3.out
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 0 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20040502/4c29c3af/i2cdetect3.obj
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: isadump.out
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 900 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20040502/4c29c3af/isadump.obj
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: lsmod.out
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 434 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20040502/4c29c3af/lsmod.obj
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: lspci.out
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 705 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20040502/4c29c3af/lspci.obj
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: lspci-n.out
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 342 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20040502/4c29c3af/lspci-n.obj
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sensors-detect.out
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 10141 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20040502/4c29c3af/sensors-detect.obj
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: config-2.6.5
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 24862 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20040502/4c29c3af/config-2.6.obj
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [lm-sensors] no sensors found
2005-05-19 6:24 No sensors found Herbert G. Fischer
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Fw: " Herbert G. Fischer
@ 2007-04-16 8:30 ` Mike Cornelison
2007-04-19 11:45 ` Jean Delvare
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mike Cornelison @ 2007-04-16 8:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
I hope this is the right place for this.
Kindly give me some guidance if not.
I am unable to get lm-sensors to work with a new MSI mainboard.
mainboard: MSI P6N SLI
chipset: nForce 650i SLI C55 + nForce 430i MCP51
Linux: Ubuntu 7.04 (beta) with kernel 2.6.20-15
lm-sensors package: 2.10.1
sensors-detect outputs:
Driver `eeprom' (should be inserted):
Detects correctly:
* Bus `NVIDIA i2c adapter 0 at 1:00.0'
Busdriver `UNKNOWN', I2C address 0x50 (and 0x51 0x52 0x53 0x54 0x55
0x56 0x57)
Chip `EDID EEPROM' (confidence: 8)
* Bus `SMBus nForce2 adapter at 5000'
Busdriver `i2c-nforce2', I2C address 0x50
Chip `SPD EEPROM' (confidence: 8)
* Bus `SMBus nForce2 adapter at 5000'
Busdriver `i2c-nforce2', I2C address 0x51
Chip `SPD EEPROM' (confidence: 8)
...
Driver `lm92' (should be inserted):
Detects correctly:
* Bus `SMBus nForce2 adapter at 6000'
Busdriver `i2c-nforce2', I2C address 0x46
Chip `Maxim MAX6633/MAX6634/MAX6635' (confidence: 2)
...
#----cut here----
# I2C adapter drivers
# modprobe unknown adapter NVIDIA i2c adapter 0 at 1:00.0
# modprobe unknown adapter NVIDIA i2c adapter 1 at 1:00.0
# modprobe unknown adapter NVIDIA i2c adapter 2 at 1:00.0
i2c-nforce2
# Chip drivers
eeprom
lm92
#----cut here----
Do you want to add these lines to /etc/modules automatically? (yes/NO)y
root@mico2:/home/mico# modprobe eeprom
root@mico2:/home/mico# modprobe lm92
root@mico2:/home/mico# sensors
No sensors found!
...
root@mico2:/home/mico# modprobe i2c-nforce2
root@mico2:/home/mico# sensors
No sensors found!
Is this mainboard not supported or should I try something else?
Thanks.
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [lm-sensors] no sensors found
2005-05-19 6:24 No sensors found Herbert G. Fischer
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2007-04-16 8:30 ` [lm-sensors] no " Mike Cornelison
@ 2007-04-19 11:45 ` Jean Delvare
2007-11-05 12:29 ` Benjamin Stokes
2007-11-05 18:41 ` Juerg Haefliger
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2007-04-19 11:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Hi Mike,
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 10:30:04 +0200, Mike Cornelison wrote:
> I hope this is the right place for this.
> Kindly give me some guidance if not.
>
> I am unable to get lm-sensors to work with a new MSI mainboard.
>
> mainboard: MSI P6N SLI
> chipset: nForce 650i SLI C55 + nForce 430i MCP51
> Linux: Ubuntu 7.04 (beta) with kernel 2.6.20-15
> lm-sensors package: 2.10.1
>
> sensors-detect outputs:
>
> Driver `eeprom' (should be inserted):
> Detects correctly:
> * Bus `NVIDIA i2c adapter 0 at 1:00.0'
> Busdriver `UNKNOWN', I2C address 0x50 (and 0x51 0x52 0x53 0x54 0x55
> 0x56 0x57)
> Chip `EDID EEPROM' (confidence: 8)
> * Bus `SMBus nForce2 adapter at 5000'
> Busdriver `i2c-nforce2', I2C address 0x50
> Chip `SPD EEPROM' (confidence: 8)
> * Bus `SMBus nForce2 adapter at 5000'
> Busdriver `i2c-nforce2', I2C address 0x51
> Chip `SPD EEPROM' (confidence: 8)
> ...
These are EEPROMs on your memory modules, not sensors, so it's expected
they don't show in the "sensors" output. Use the decode-dimms.pl script
if you want to decode the contents of the EEPROMs.
>
> Driver `lm92' (should be inserted):
> Detects correctly:
> * Bus `SMBus nForce2 adapter at 6000'
> Busdriver `i2c-nforce2', I2C address 0x46
> Chip `Maxim MAX6633/MAX6634/MAX6635' (confidence: 2)
> ...
This is a rather rare chip, and easily misdetected (see the low
confidence value). So I don't think you actually have this chip, and
you shouldn't load the lm92 driver.
>
> #----cut here----
> # I2C adapter drivers
> # modprobe unknown adapter NVIDIA i2c adapter 0 at 1:00.0
> # modprobe unknown adapter NVIDIA i2c adapter 1 at 1:00.0
> # modprobe unknown adapter NVIDIA i2c adapter 2 at 1:00.0
> i2c-nforce2
> # Chip drivers
> eeprom
> lm92
> #----cut here----
>
> Do you want to add these lines to /etc/modules automatically? (yes/NO)y
>
> root@mico2:/home/mico# modprobe eeprom
> root@mico2:/home/mico# modprobe lm92
> root@mico2:/home/mico# sensors
> No sensors found!
> ...
> root@mico2:/home/mico# modprobe i2c-nforce2
> root@mico2:/home/mico# sensors
> No sensors found!
>
>
> Is this mainboard not supported or should I try something else?
Please provide the full output of sensors-detect from lm-sensors
2.10.3. Most likely the sensor chip is too recent for the (relatively)
old version of sensors-detect that you used, so it didn't find it.
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [lm-sensors] no sensors found
2005-05-19 6:24 No sensors found Herbert G. Fischer
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2007-04-19 11:45 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2007-11-05 12:29 ` Benjamin Stokes
2007-11-05 18:41 ` Juerg Haefliger
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Stokes @ 2007-11-05 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 748 bytes --]
I have an IWILL 333xp board that has sensors.
running Ubuntu 7.0.7 with the 2.6.20-16-generic Kernel.
I have not been able to get any output for my sensors using the commands you laid down, even though in Windows XP, I have had success using MotherBoard Monitor Ver. 5...
Any suggestions on how to get this to work again?
I can still boot to XP and run MBM if nesecary(to get sensor info) if you will tell me what to do from there.
thanx
________________________________________________________________
I once pushed the button marked "do not touch"...
I will never do it again...
maybe...
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 990 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [lm-sensors] no sensors found
2005-05-19 6:24 No sensors found Herbert G. Fischer
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2007-11-05 12:29 ` Benjamin Stokes
@ 2007-11-05 18:41 ` Juerg Haefliger
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Juerg Haefliger @ 2007-11-05 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Hi,
> I have an IWILL 333xp board that has sensors.
> running Ubuntu 7.0.7 with the 2.6.20-16-generic Kernel.
> I have not been able to get any output for my sensors using the commands you
> laid down, even though in Windows XP, I have had success using MotherBoard
> Monitor Ver. 5...
Download the latest lm-sensors package (2.10.5), run sensors-detect
from that package and post the full output.
> Any suggestions on how to get this to work again?
> I can still boot to XP and run MBM if nesecary(to get sensor info) if you
> will tell me what to do from there.
Get Speedfan (http://www.almico.com/speedfan.php), run it and let us
know what it finds.
...juerg
> thanx
> ________________________________________________________________
> I once pushed the button marked "do not touch"...
> I will never do it again...
> maybe...
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> lm-sensors mailing list
> lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
>
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread