From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Kill off legacy power management stuff.
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 18:12:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46254666.2020308@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200704131022.45315.rjw@sisk.pl>
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [appropriate CCs added]
>
> On Friday, 13 April 2007 02:33, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>> just something i threw together, not in final form, but it represents
>> tossing the legacy PM stuff. at the moment, the menuconfig entry for
>> PM_LEGACY lists it as "DEPRECATED", while the help screen calls it
>> "obsolete." that's a good sign that it's getting close to the time
>> for it to go, and the removal is fairly straightforward, but there's
>> no mention of its removal in the feature removal schedule file.
>
> It's been like this for a long long time. I think you're right that it can be
> dropped, but I don't know the details (eg. why it hasn't been dropped yet).
>
One reason was that there are (were?) a number of machines which only
powered down properly using apm. It was discussed as part of shutting
down after power failure when your UPS is running out of power.
I haven't checked on that in a while, I'm just supplying one reason
since you wondered.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>,
pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Kill off legacy power management stuff.
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 18:12:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46254666.2020308@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200704131022.45315.rjw@sisk.pl>
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [appropriate CCs added]
>
> On Friday, 13 April 2007 02:33, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>> just something i threw together, not in final form, but it represents
>> tossing the legacy PM stuff. at the moment, the menuconfig entry for
>> PM_LEGACY lists it as "DEPRECATED", while the help screen calls it
>> "obsolete." that's a good sign that it's getting close to the time
>> for it to go, and the removal is fairly straightforward, but there's
>> no mention of its removal in the feature removal schedule file.
>
> It's been like this for a long long time. I think you're right that it can be
> dropped, but I don't know the details (eg. why it hasn't been dropped yet).
>
One reason was that there are (were?) a number of machines which only
powered down properly using apm. It was discussed as part of shutting
down after power failure when your UPS is running out of power.
I haven't checked on that in a while, I'm just supplying one reason
since you wondered.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-17 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-13 0:33 [PATCH][RFC] Kill off legacy power management stuff Robert P. J. Day
2007-04-13 8:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2007-04-13 8:20 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-04-13 8:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2007-04-13 8:50 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-04-14 12:22 ` {Spam?} " Robert P. J. Day
2007-04-14 13:01 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-04-18 19:24 ` Len Brown
2007-04-18 20:23 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-04-18 21:23 ` Len Brown
2007-04-18 23:45 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-04-18 23:58 ` Dave Jones
2007-04-19 0:35 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-04-19 17:27 ` Len Brown
2007-04-13 8:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-13 8:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-13 9:51 ` David Brownell
2007-04-13 9:51 ` [linux-pm] " David Brownell
2007-04-15 10:23 ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-15 10:23 ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-17 22:12 ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
2007-04-17 22:12 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-04-17 22:28 ` David Brownell
2007-04-17 22:28 ` [linux-pm] " David Brownell
2007-04-18 0:46 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-04-18 0:46 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-04-18 18:11 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-04-18 18:11 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-04-18 18:31 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-04-18 18:31 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-04-18 20:10 ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-18 20:10 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46254666.2020308@tmr.com \
--to=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=rpjday@mindspring.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.