From: Padam J Singh <me@padamj.com>
To: Lokesh <lokeshnb@intoto.com>
Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Async processing using NetFilters
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:39:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46306C5A.2060101@padamj.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200704260852.l3Q8qPg0028578@brahma.intotoind.com>
Hello Lokesh,
Try the NF_STOLEN approach, and take care of the skb. You can re-inject
the packet this way.
R,
Padam.
Lokesh wrote:
> Hi All,
>> I'm using Linux RedHat 9 kernel version 2.4.20-8
>> I want to do some asynchronous processing of packets in my kernel
>> module that is registered as
>> Netfilter Hook. I tried to make use of NF_QUEUE but found that only
>> one call back function per
>> protocol family (PF) is provided and already some module (probably
>> NET_LINK socket interface)
>> is making use of it for PF_INET. Is there any way to use NF_QUEUE
>> facility without disturbing
>> NET_LINK ? why per hook registration of call back function of
>> NF_QUEUE is not provided?
>> How to proceed if someone had to do async processing of packets so
>> that pkts can be queued to crypto hardware processing unit and can be
>> safely reinjected back into kernel later so that other registered
>> hooks can get pkts?
>> any help is highly appreciated.
>> Thanks
>
>
>
> ********************************************************************************
>
> This email message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
> the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary
> and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure
> or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
> please immediately notify the sender by reply email and destroy all
> copies of the original message. Thank you.
>
> Intoto Inc.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-26 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-26 8:57 Async processing using NetFilters Lokesh
2007-04-26 9:09 ` Padam J Singh [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-14 11:52 Lokesh
2007-04-26 9:53 Lokesh
2007-04-23 12:35 Lokesh
2007-04-19 7:35 Lokesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46306C5A.2060101@padamj.com \
--to=me@padamj.com \
--cc=lokeshnb@intoto.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.