* 3.0.5-rc4 breakage in XendPIF.py
@ 2007-05-01 20:08 Charles Coffing
2007-05-01 20:30 ` Keir Fraser
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Charles Coffing @ 2007-05-01 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
Trying to start 3.0.5-rc4's xend, I get:
[...snip...]
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/xen/xend/XendPIF.py", line 309, in destroy
raise PIFIsPhysical(self.get_uuid())
TypeError: __init__() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given)
Looks like it was changeset 14974 that introduced the problem.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: 3.0.5-rc4 breakage in XendPIF.py
2007-05-01 20:08 3.0.5-rc4 breakage in XendPIF.py Charles Coffing
@ 2007-05-01 20:30 ` Keir Fraser
2007-05-01 21:07 ` Charles Coffing
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Keir Fraser @ 2007-05-01 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Charles Coffing, xen-devel; +Cc: Tom Wilkie
On 1/5/07 21:08, "Charles Coffing" <ccoffing@novell.com> wrote:
> Trying to start 3.0.5-rc4's xend, I get:
>
> [...snip...]
> File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/xen/xend/XendPIF.py", line 309, in
> destroy
> raise PIFIsPhysical(self.get_uuid())
> TypeError: __init__() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given)
>
>
> Looks like it was changeset 14974 that introduced the problem.
If you remove the argument to PIFIsPhysical(), does that fix it?
-- Keir
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: 3.0.5-rc4 breakage in XendPIF.py
2007-05-01 20:30 ` Keir Fraser
@ 2007-05-01 21:07 ` Charles Coffing
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Charles Coffing @ 2007-05-01 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keir Fraser, xen-devel; +Cc: Tom Wilkie
On Tue, May 1, 2007 at 2:30 PM, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> On 1/5/07 21:08, "Charles Coffing" <ccoffing@novell.com> wrote:
>
>> Trying to start 3.0.5-rc4's xend, I get:
>>
>> [...snip...]
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/xen/xend/XendPIF.py", line 309, in
>> destroy
>> raise PIFIsPhysical(self.get_uuid())
>> TypeError: __init__() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given)
>>
>>
>> Looks like it was changeset 14974 that introduced the problem.
>
> If you remove the argument to PIFIsPhysical(), does that fix it?
Yes.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-05-01 21:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-05-01 20:08 3.0.5-rc4 breakage in XendPIF.py Charles Coffing
2007-05-01 20:30 ` Keir Fraser
2007-05-01 21:07 ` Charles Coffing
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.