Re: [PATCH 2/2] Rename get_property to of_get_property: drivers/net

[Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>]

Kumar Gala wrote:
> 
> On May 2, 2007, at 9:17 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
>> Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> On Apr 28, 2007, at 10:47 PM, David Miller wrote:
>>>> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
>>>> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:44:46 +1000
>>>>
>>>>> So can I take this as a future OK for architecture specific network
>>>>> drivers changes to go through the architecture trees (cc'd to you)?
>>>>
>>>> It's been my experience that if I'm just working through some
>>>> platform or bus specific API changes, people like Jeff tend to
>>>> not mind if it goes via ARCH trees and the like.
>>> Is this acceptable?   Just want to make sure before I ask Paul to 
>>> pull some changes that touches the following drivers:
>>> drivers/net/fs_enet/mac-scc.c           |    2 +-
>>> drivers/net/ucc_geth.c                  |   30 ++++----
>>> drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_cpm1.c |    4 +-
>>> drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_cpm2.c |    4 +-
>>
>> I don't see a patch, just a diffstat.
> 
> I haven't sent a patch, just asking the question if I need to break it 
> up or not.

Without seeing the patch, I have no idea...

	Jeff