* Use proc or sysfs with cpufrequtils
@ 2007-05-04 2:31 Chris Pemberton
2007-05-04 13:41 ` Mattia Dongili
2007-05-04 14:15 ` Thomas Renninger
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Pemberton @ 2007-05-04 2:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
Hello,
I'm compiling cpufrequtils from scratch. My kernel contains ACPI/proc
support only (not ACPI/sysfs).
1. Why does the kernel state that ACPI/sysfs depreciated while
cpufrequtils states that ACPI/proc is depreciated?
2. Can you enable both ACPI/sysfs and ACPI/proc in the kernel without
any issues?
3. Does this list have a searchable webpage?
Thanks,
Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Use proc or sysfs with cpufrequtils
2007-05-04 2:31 Use proc or sysfs with cpufrequtils Chris Pemberton
@ 2007-05-04 13:41 ` Mattia Dongili
2007-05-04 14:15 ` Thomas Renninger
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mattia Dongili @ 2007-05-04 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Pemberton; +Cc: cpufreq
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 09:31:52PM -0500, Chris Pemberton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm compiling cpufrequtils from scratch. My kernel contains ACPI/proc
> support only (not ACPI/sysfs).
>
> 1. Why does the kernel state that ACPI/sysfs depreciated while
> cpufrequtils states that ACPI/proc is depreciated?
the cpufreq stuff has little to do with /proc/acpi. From cpufreq POW the
deprecated stuff is /proc/cpufreq while the way to go is
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuN/cpufreq/
That's all
>
> 2. Can you enable both ACPI/sysfs and ACPI/proc in the kernel without
> any issues?
>
> 3. Does this list have a searchable webpage?
I don't think so.
cheers
--
mattia
:wq!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Use proc or sysfs with cpufrequtils
2007-05-04 2:31 Use proc or sysfs with cpufrequtils Chris Pemberton
2007-05-04 13:41 ` Mattia Dongili
@ 2007-05-04 14:15 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-05-04 17:01 ` Chris Pemberton
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Renninger @ 2007-05-04 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Pemberton; +Cc: cpufreq
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 21:31 -0500, Chris Pemberton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm compiling cpufrequtils from scratch. My kernel contains ACPI/proc
> support only (not ACPI/sysfs).
>
> 1. Why does the kernel state that ACPI/sysfs depreciated while
> cpufrequtils states that ACPI/proc is depreciated?
>
> 2. Can you enable both ACPI/sysfs and ACPI/proc in the kernel without
> any issues?
>
> 3. Does this list have a searchable webpage?
> http://lists.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq
You can just download some monthly archives, feed your mailer with it
and search for things?
Some days ago I thought it's down or broken, but this came out to be an
opera (9.10) problem, I still get:
You tried to access the address
http://lists.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq, which is currently
unavailable...
firefox is working.
Thomas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-05-04 17:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-05-04 2:31 Use proc or sysfs with cpufrequtils Chris Pemberton
2007-05-04 13:41 ` Mattia Dongili
2007-05-04 14:15 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-05-04 17:01 ` Chris Pemberton
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.