All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafał Bilski" <rafalbilski@interia.pl>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: Wander Winkelhorst <w.winkelhorst@gmail.com>,
	David Johnson <dj@david-web.co.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up
Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 11:23:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <463D9E8E.8040500@interia.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0705060959200.23047@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>

> <6>No local APIC present or hardware disabled
> <7>mapped APIC to ffffd000 (011ea000)
> <5>Local APIC not detected. Using dummy APIC emulation.
I/O APIC is very bad thing with Longhaul, but You don't have 
local APIC, so it shouldn't be used.
> <6>ACPI: Using PIC for interrupt routing
Looks like it isn't.
> <4>ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [ALKA] (IRQs *20), disabled.
> <4>ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [ALKB] (IRQs *21)
> <4>ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [ALKC] (IRQs *22)
> <4>ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [ALKD] (IRQs *23), disabled.
This is pointing to I/O APIC, but I don't see later that 
such high interrupts are used. And if I/O APIC would be in 
use You would have lockup in the moment of transition.

I was suspecting:
> One of the 2.6.21 regressions was Guilherme's problem seeing his box
> lock up when the system detected an unstable TSC and dropped back to
> using the HPET.
> 
> In digging deeper, we found the HPET is not actually incrementing on
> this system. And in fact, the reason why this issue just cropped up was
> because of Thomas's clocksource watchdog code was comparing the TSC to
> the HPET (which wasn't moving) and thought the TSC was broken.
because I know that VT8237 has HPET built in. But I don't see any lines 
starting with "hpet: enabled" or something similar. But I don't know 
what to search for. I didn't have contact with HPET earlier.
It is very similar and Your problem with ondemand is starting right 
after
> May  3 19:17:22 cn kernel: Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -136422685 
> ns)
I don't see such message as long as "performance" governor is used. 

Anyway adding "hpet=disable" at boot should confirm for sure that it 
isn't it. And I think that John already ruled this out by 
clocksource=acpi_pm.

Sorry 
Rafa³

----------------------------------------------------------------------- Linda jako gospodyni domowa - zobacz!!!
>>> http://link.interia.pl/f1a79

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Rafał Bilski" <rafalbilski@interia.pl>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: Wander Winkelhorst <w.winkelhorst@gmail.com>,
	David Johnson <dj@david-web.co.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up
Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 11:23:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <463D9E8E.8040500@interia.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0705060959200.23047@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>

> <6>No local APIC present or hardware disabled
> <7>mapped APIC to ffffd000 (011ea000)
> <5>Local APIC not detected. Using dummy APIC emulation.
I/O APIC is very bad thing with Longhaul, but You don't have 
local APIC, so it shouldn't be used.
> <6>ACPI: Using PIC for interrupt routing
Looks like it isn't.
> <4>ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [ALKA] (IRQs *20), disabled.
> <4>ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [ALKB] (IRQs *21)
> <4>ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [ALKC] (IRQs *22)
> <4>ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [ALKD] (IRQs *23), disabled.
This is pointing to I/O APIC, but I don't see later that 
such high interrupts are used. And if I/O APIC would be in 
use You would have lockup in the moment of transition.

I was suspecting:
> One of the 2.6.21 regressions was Guilherme's problem seeing his box
> lock up when the system detected an unstable TSC and dropped back to
> using the HPET.
> 
> In digging deeper, we found the HPET is not actually incrementing on
> this system. And in fact, the reason why this issue just cropped up was
> because of Thomas's clocksource watchdog code was comparing the TSC to
> the HPET (which wasn't moving) and thought the TSC was broken.
because I know that VT8237 has HPET built in. But I don't see any lines 
starting with "hpet: enabled" or something similar. But I don't know 
what to search for. I didn't have contact with HPET earlier.
It is very similar and Your problem with ondemand is starting right 
after
> May  3 19:17:22 cn kernel: Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -136422685 
> ns)
I don't see such message as long as "performance" governor is used. 

Anyway adding "hpet=disable" at boot should confirm for sure that it 
isn't it. And I think that John already ruled this out by 
clocksource=acpi_pm.

Sorry 
Rafał

----------------------------------------------------------------------- Linda jako gospodyni domowa - zobacz!!!
>>> http://link.interia.pl/f1a79


  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-06  9:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-04 10:16 cpufreq longhaul locks up Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-04 11:36 ` Wander Winkelhorst
2007-05-04 11:51   ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-04 11:51     ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-04 17:08 ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-04 17:08   ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-04 17:42   ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-05-04 17:42     ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-05-04 18:40     ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-04 18:08   ` Wander Winkelhorst
2007-05-04 19:00     ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-04 19:00       ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-04 18:48   ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-04 18:48     ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-04 20:11     ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-04 20:11       ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-04 21:03       ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-04 21:03         ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-04 20:37 ` john stultz
2007-05-04 21:02   ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-04 22:49     ` john stultz
2007-05-04 23:32       ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05  4:03         ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05  8:00           ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05  8:00             ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05 13:58             ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05 13:58               ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05 18:13               ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05 18:13                 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-04 22:20 ` David Johnson
2007-05-04 22:20   ` David Johnson
2007-05-04 23:37   ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-04 23:37     ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05  5:40     ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05  5:40       ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05  8:44       ` Wander Winkelhorst
2007-05-05 14:02         ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05 14:02           ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05 17:48         ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05 17:48           ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05 18:42           ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05 18:42             ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05 19:58             ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05 19:58               ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05 20:30               ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05 20:30                 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05 20:50               ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05 20:50                 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05 21:32                 ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-06  7:53                   ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-06  7:53                     ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-06  5:12                 ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-06  5:12                   ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-06  8:03                   ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-06  8:03                     ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-06  9:23                     ` Rafał Bilski [this message]
2007-05-06  9:23                       ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-06  9:32                       ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-06 10:25                         ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-06 10:25                           ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-06 11:33                           ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-06 12:20                             ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05  9:37       ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05  9:37         ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05 14:10         ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05 14:10           ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05 17:38           ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05 17:38             ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05 18:04             ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05 18:04               ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05 18:23               ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05 18:23                 ` Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=463D9E8E.8040500@interia.pl \
    --to=rafalbilski@interia.pl \
    --cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=dj@david-web.co.uk \
    --cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=w.winkelhorst@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.