* network virtualization performances
@ 2007-05-02 19:53 Daniel Lezcano
2007-05-04 1:16 ` Herbert Xu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Lezcano @ 2007-05-02 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
Hi all,
I am currently working on the network virtualization for lightweight
containers based on the network namespace concept.
The network device list are relative to a namespace, so in one
namespace, you can not access to network device belonging to another
namespace. To allow the namespace to communicate, a special network
device has been written. It is like a "pipe" but for the network with an
extremity in each namespace. By this way, the virtualized environment
can send traffic via a network device (an extremity of the "pipe") and
the traffic goes to the namespace where the real nic is.
During some performance testing, I noticed that using the Gigabyte NIC
and netperf, the cpu usage is much more important when the network is
virtualized than when not. After investigating, it appears the real NIC
is an offload card and when we are using the virtual network device, the
offloading is lost and the kernel spends a lot of time to compute
checksums and tcp segmentations. That makes sense because the virtual
device has not the HW feature like the real NIC.
After looking in internet, I found the "Optimizing Network
Virtualization in Xen" document and the problems seems to be exactly the
same.
Do you have some pointers, informations about these optimization,
specific optimization code or anything else which can help me ?
Thanks you in advance.
Regards.
-- Daniel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: network virtualization performances
2007-05-02 19:53 network virtualization performances Daniel Lezcano
@ 2007-05-04 1:16 ` Herbert Xu
2007-05-06 20:37 ` Daniel Lezcano
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Herbert Xu @ 2007-05-04 1:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Lezcano; +Cc: xen-devel
Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Do you have some pointers, informations about these optimization,
> specific optimization code or anything else which can help me ?
If you have a look at the files under drivers/xen/{netfront,netback}
it should show you how Xen makes the hardware offload capabilities
available to the guest.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: network virtualization performances
2007-05-04 1:16 ` Herbert Xu
@ 2007-05-06 20:37 ` Daniel Lezcano
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Lezcano @ 2007-05-06 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Herbert Xu; +Cc: xen-devel
Herbert Xu wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Do you have some pointers, informations about these optimization,
>> specific optimization code or anything else which can help me ?
>>
>
> If you have a look at the files under drivers/xen/{netfront,netback}
> it should show you how Xen makes the hardware offload capabilities
> available to the guest.
>
> Cheers,
>
Thank you very much Herbert, I will look at that.
Regards
-- Daniel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-05-06 20:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-05-02 19:53 network virtualization performances Daniel Lezcano
2007-05-04 1:16 ` Herbert Xu
2007-05-06 20:37 ` Daniel Lezcano
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.