From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: svm vmexit action sequence
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 18:01:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46435E16.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> (raw)
Is there any particular reason why on 32-bits the order is VMLOAD then
HVM_SAVE_ALL_NOSEGREGS, while on 64-bits its is the other way around?
Trying to put in the saving of EAX, I could save a GET_CURRENT() on 32-bits
if I could order things the same way as on 64-bits.
Also, both versions seem to have a redundant GET_CURRENT() right after
the clgi/sti sequence - again, is there a particular reason for this?
Thanks, Jan
next reply other threads:[~2007-05-10 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-10 16:01 Jan Beulich [this message]
2007-05-10 16:12 ` svm vmexit action sequence Petersson, Mats
2007-05-11 7:28 ` Jan Beulich
2007-05-11 7:37 ` Keir Fraser
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-11 7:42 Jan Beulich
2007-05-11 7:51 ` Keir Fraser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46435E16.76E4.0078.0@novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.