From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
To: michael@ellerman.id.au
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
paulus@samba.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] update sysfs kset initialisation in PPC64 DLPAR IO driver
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:40:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46444820.2020506@shadowen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1178870289.3923.6.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 00:16 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 04:54:41PM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>>> Greg KH wrote:
>>>> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 03:00:50PM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>>>>> Move the rpadlpar device from "struct subsystem" to "struct kset"
>>>>> following the changes in sysfs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, this patch seems to sort out the compile problem
>>>>> here and indeed boots and runs kernbench. Perhaps
>>>>> you could confirm this is sufficient.
>>>> As per the discussion on the pci hotplug list, no, this doesn't seem to
>>>> fix the problem. The developers there are looking into it. If you can
>>>> test out patches for this, I'm sure the people there would appreciate
>>>> the help.
>>> Sure anything they have for testing, send them to me ...
>> They have the same patch that you made (I made it), yet they reported
>> that it didn't work properly for them.
>>
>> Can you test your patch out on "real" hardware?
>
> I tested it on real hardware, but it can't hurt for Andy to try it too I
> guess.
To be fair I am not sure I have a clue how to test it. Got a recipe?
My patch was based on how other drivers seemed to be converted which is
a concern for those drivers.
What sort of failure do you see?
-apw
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
To: michael@ellerman.id.au
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
paulus@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] update sysfs kset initialisation in PPC64 DLPAR IO driver
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:40:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46444820.2020506@shadowen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1178870289.3923.6.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 00:16 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 04:54:41PM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>>> Greg KH wrote:
>>>> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 03:00:50PM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>>>>> Move the rpadlpar device from "struct subsystem" to "struct kset"
>>>>> following the changes in sysfs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, this patch seems to sort out the compile problem
>>>>> here and indeed boots and runs kernbench. Perhaps
>>>>> you could confirm this is sufficient.
>>>> As per the discussion on the pci hotplug list, no, this doesn't seem to
>>>> fix the problem. The developers there are looking into it. If you can
>>>> test out patches for this, I'm sure the people there would appreciate
>>>> the help.
>>> Sure anything they have for testing, send them to me ...
>> They have the same patch that you made (I made it), yet they reported
>> that it didn't work properly for them.
>>
>> Can you test your patch out on "real" hardware?
>
> I tested it on real hardware, but it can't hurt for Andy to try it too I
> guess.
To be fair I am not sure I have a clue how to test it. Got a recipe?
My patch was based on how other drivers seemed to be converted which is
a concern for those drivers.
What sort of failure do you see?
-apw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-11 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-10 13:49 2.6.21-git5 -- powerpc link failure Andy Whitcroft
2007-05-10 14:00 ` [PATCH] update sysfs kset initialisation in PPC64 DLPAR IO driver Andy Whitcroft
2007-05-10 14:00 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-05-10 14:12 ` Greg KH
2007-05-10 14:12 ` Greg KH
2007-05-10 15:54 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-05-10 15:54 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-05-11 7:16 ` Greg KH
2007-05-11 7:16 ` Greg KH
2007-05-11 7:58 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-05-11 7:58 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-05-11 10:40 ` Andy Whitcroft [this message]
2007-05-11 10:40 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-05-12 2:17 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-05-12 2:17 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46444820.2020506@shadowen.org \
--to=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.