From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: jimmy bahuleyan <knight.camelot@gmail.com>
Cc: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@gmail.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Stezenbach <js@linuxtv.org>,
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
Heikki Orsila <shdl@zakalwe.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 3
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 03:45:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <464570AC.5030108@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46456DDE.5070006@gmail.com>
jimmy bahuleyan wrote:
> i believe, the doc here is pretty unambiguous regarding the fact that
> volatile should be avoided. And as Stefan pointed out, anyone who feels
> the need to use, must surely _know_ what he is doing & hence is in a
> position t make that decision
Honestly, the above quoted paragraph states the situation better than
any long, complicated document.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-12 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-11 17:36 [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 3 Jonathan Corbet
2007-05-11 21:25 ` Jesper Juhl
2007-05-12 3:21 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-12 4:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-12 5:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-12 5:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-12 6:15 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-12 6:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-12 7:02 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-12 7:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-12 7:28 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-12 7:53 ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-12 11:51 ` Heikki Orsila
2007-05-12 18:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-12 7:22 ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-12 7:33 ` jimmy bahuleyan
2007-05-12 7:45 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2007-05-12 19:17 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
[not found] <8jHg3-1T2-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <8jQt5-7As-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <8jSuQ-28J-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <8jT7y-39x-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
2007-05-13 0:00 ` Bodo Eggert
2007-05-14 3:37 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-17 23:51 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-05-18 3:13 ` Satyam Sharma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=464570AC.5030108@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=js@linuxtv.org \
--cc=knight.camelot@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=satyam.sharma@gmail.com \
--cc=shdl@zakalwe.fi \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.