All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: hadi@cyberus.ca
Cc: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>,
	Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: take 3 [RFC] make qdisc_restart more readable
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 19:02:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4645F325.3060607@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1178972280.4061.7.camel@localhost>

jamal wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index f671cd2..718d6fd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -83,6 +83,9 @@ struct wireless_dev;
>  #define NETDEV_TX_OK 0		/* driver took care of packet */
>  #define NETDEV_TX_BUSY 1	/* driver tx path was busy*/
>  #define NETDEV_TX_LOCKED -1	/* driver tx lock was already taken */
> +#define NETDEV_TX_DROP -2	/* request caller to drop packet */

This shouldn't be a NETDEV_TX code since its only handled correctly
internally for handle_dev_cpu_collision().

> +#define NETDEV_TX_QUEUE -3	/* request caller to requeue packet */

How will this be used? The driver can simply stop the queue if
it doesn't want to receive more packets.

> +static inline int handle_dev_cpu_collision(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> +	if (dev->xmit_lock_owner == smp_processor_id()) {

unlikely would make sense here.

> +static inline int
> +handle_dev_requeue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, struct Qdisc *q)
> +{
> +
> +	if (unlikely(q == &noop_qdisc))
> +		kfree_skb(skb);

Why is this special-casing needed? __qdisc_run already checks for
noop_qdisc and noop has a proper requeue function.

> +	else if (skb->next)
> +		dev->gso_skb = skb;

The gso_skb cases could probably also be marked unlikely.

> +	else
> +		q->ops->requeue(skb, q);
> +	/* XXX: Could netif_schedule fail? Or is that fact we are
> +	 * requeueing imply the hardware path is closed
> +	 * and even if we fail, some interupt will wake us
> +	*/
> +	netif_schedule(dev);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct sk_buff *
> +try_get_tx_pkt(struct net_device *dev, struct Qdisc *q)
> +{
> +	struct sk_buff *skb = dev->gso_skb;
> +
> +	if (skb)
> +		dev->gso_skb = NULL;
> +	else
> +		skb = q->dequeue(q);
> +
> +	return skb;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int
> +handle_tx_locked(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, struct Qdisc *q)

handle_.* sounds a bit like "I couldn't think of a better name" :)
How about dev_tx_locked()?

> +{
> +	int ret =  (dev);
> +
> +	if (ret == NETDEV_TX_DROP) {
> +		kfree_skb(skb);
> +		return qdisc_qlen(q);
> +	}
> +
> +	return handle_dev_requeue(skb, dev, q);
> +}

> +	if (unlikely (ret != NETDEV_TX_BUSY)) {
> +		/* XXX: Do we need a ratelimit? or put a
> +		 * BUG_ON((int) ret != NETDEV_TX_BUSY) ?
> +		 **/
> +		printk("BUG %s code %d qlen %d\n",dev->name, ret, q->q.qlen);

BUG_ON sounds a bit extreme, net_ratelimit() makes sense.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-12 17:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-11  0:13 [RFC] make qdisc_restart more readable jamal
2007-05-11 15:56 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-11 18:04   ` jamal
2007-05-11 18:13     ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-11 18:35       ` jamal
2007-05-11 18:46         ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-11 19:29           ` take 2 WAS (RE: " jamal
2007-05-11 22:01             ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-11 22:43               ` jamal
2007-05-12  9:46             ` Thomas Graf
2007-05-12 11:58               ` jamal
2007-05-12 12:18             ` take 3 " jamal
2007-05-12 17:02               ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2007-05-12 19:56                 ` jamal
2007-05-13 14:28                   ` [LAST CALL] [PATCH] [NET_SCHED]make " jamal
2007-05-14 10:40                     ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-14 12:41                       ` jamal
2007-05-14 12:43                         ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-14 13:30                     ` jamal
2007-05-14 20:09                       ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-16 22:55                       ` jamal
2007-05-16 23:00                         ` David Miller
2007-05-16 23:15                         ` Sridhar Samudrala
2007-05-17  2:12                           ` jamal
2007-05-11 17:01 ` [RFC] make " Thomas Graf
2007-05-11 18:11   ` jamal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4645F325.3060607@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
    --cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.