All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Ketrenos <jketreno@linux.intel.com>
To: Michael Wu <flamingice@sourmilk.net>
Cc: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>, Jiri Benc <jbenc@suse.cz>,
	John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: Update stop_queues kdoc
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 10:32:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46605814.1090806@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200706011204.23666.flamingice@sourmilk.net>

Michael Wu wrote:
> On Friday 01 June 2007 09:58, James Ketrenos wrote:
>> In this way we are putting in a work around that doesn't result in an API
>> change, and that can eventually (hopefully) be fixed the "right way"
>> (whatever that may end up being)
>>
> A workaround could be implemented, but I currently don't see any cases where 
> stopping/waking the queue outside of open/stop/tx is necessary or correct. 

Is calling the ieee80211_stop_queue[s] from open/stop OK then?  The doc update said only in ops->tx.  Should the driver be calling it in the stop callback, or will the stack stop the queues for us?

iwlwifi currently calls ieee80211_stop_queue from the Tx handler and calls ieee80211_stop_queues in the event the adapter is reset (due to HW error, RF kill transition, hw tear down, etc.) as it asynchronously brings re-initializes the hardware.

We definitely need to wake the queue outside of open/stop/tx.  If you stop the queue due to the HW ring being full, you won't be able to wake the queue until the HW has asynchronously freed a Tx slot.

iwlwifi calls ieee80211_wake_queue during buffer reclaiming after the HW indicates the Tx has completed. 

James

> (in bcm43xx, stopping the tx rings is more correct and effective for what is 
> being done there - stopping TX so the radio can be recalibrated)
> 
> -Michael Wu

  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-01 19:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-01  9:29 [PATCH] mac80211: Update stop_queues kdoc Michael Buesch
2007-06-01  9:48 ` Johannes Berg
2007-06-01  9:53   ` Michael Buesch
2007-06-01 11:55 ` Olivier Cornu
2007-06-01 20:42   ` Michael Buesch
2007-06-01 21:00     ` Olivier Cornu
2007-06-01 21:42       ` Michael Buesch
2007-06-01 21:53         ` Olivier Cornu
2007-06-02 13:17         ` Olivier Cornu
2007-06-02 13:37           ` Michael Buesch
2007-06-02 18:41             ` Olivier Cornu
2007-06-01 16:58 ` James Ketrenos
2007-06-01 19:04   ` Michael Wu
2007-06-01 17:32     ` James Ketrenos [this message]
2007-06-01 20:36       ` Michael Wu
2007-06-01 20:52         ` Michael Buesch
2007-06-01 20:41       ` Michael Buesch
2007-06-01 20:52       ` Olivier Cornu
2007-06-01 20:54         ` Michael Buesch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46605814.1090806@linux.intel.com \
    --to=jketreno@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=flamingice@sourmilk.net \
    --cc=jbenc@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.