From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Urs Thuermann <urs@isnogud.escape.de>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Oliver Hartkopp <oliver.hartkopp@volkswagen.de>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 5/7] CAN: Add virtual CAN netdevice driver
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 20:27:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46630805.9070309@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ygfsl9azsji.fsf@janus.isnogud.escape.de>
Urs Thuermann wrote:
> Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> writes:
>
>>And it allows you have both loopback and non-loopback devices
>>in case that would be useful.
>
>
> That sounds very promising. I also was unhappy with the fixed number
> of vcan devices at module load time and have thought about ioctl's to
> add/delete devices and to change the loopback flag. A more general
> approach like the one you seem to be working on is preferable of
> course.
I got a bit delayed, but I hope to have the patches in postable state
tommorrow.
>>Qdiscs might change skb->cb. Maybe use skb->sk?
>
>
> When we decided to use skb->cb it seemed the only possible option.
> We need a field that we can set to zero to indicate we don't want the
> driver to loop back the packet and the value in that field must
> survive the path
>
> can_send()
> dev_queue_xmit()
> ...
> dev->hard_start_xmit()
>
> netif_rx()
> can_rcv()
>
> I think I misread the comment
>
> * @cb: Control buffer. Free for use by every layer. Put private vars here
>
> to mean I can use it for this purpose and since it worked as intended
> we felt ok with this. Now I see, it states exactly the opposite that
> I can't count on the value being preserved across layers.
Yes, that comment is a bit misleading.
> skb->sk can't be used since we shouldn't set it to zero before
> dev_queue_xmit() as Oliver already pointed out. IIRC, skb->sk
> couldn't also be used in rx half of that path, since it was set to
> null somewhere in netif_rx() but now, reading the src, I can't see
> where this would happen. Maybe this has changed or my memory has some
> bit errors. I'll look at it again. Even if it turns out skb->sk can
> be used in rx path, the need remains to pass down a flag from
> can_send() to dev->hard_start_xmit() indicating whether to loop back
> or not.
That flag is a socket flag acording to Oliver, so you can use the flag
itself. You could keep skb->sk for the RX path (don't call skb_orphan
in your hard_start_xmit function), if that doesn't work worst case would
be to use a flag in the skb (we still have 2 unused bits) until you've
figured out a better way.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-03 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-30 13:11 [patch 0/7] CAN: Add new PF_CAN protocol family, update Urs Thuermann
2007-05-30 13:11 ` [patch 1/7] CAN: Allocate protocol numbers for PF_CAN Urs Thuermann
2007-05-30 13:11 ` [patch 2/7] CAN: Add PF_CAN core module Urs Thuermann
2007-05-30 13:11 ` [patch 3/7] CAN: Add raw protocol Urs Thuermann
2007-05-30 13:11 ` [patch 4/7] CAN: Add broadcast manager (bcm) protocol Urs Thuermann
2007-05-30 13:11 ` [patch 5/7] CAN: Add virtual CAN netdevice driver Urs Thuermann
2007-05-30 17:13 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-30 18:39 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-05-30 19:16 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-30 19:48 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-05-30 19:58 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-31 5:13 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-05-31 20:25 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-06-01 14:54 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-02 9:51 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-06-02 19:58 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-06-03 19:16 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-06-04 11:53 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-04 12:44 ` Urs Thuermann
2007-06-06 11:39 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-04 12:17 ` Urs Thuermann
2007-06-04 16:32 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-06-04 18:26 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-06-02 8:09 ` Urs Thuermann
2007-06-03 18:27 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2007-05-30 17:28 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-05-30 18:57 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-05-30 19:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-05-30 19:25 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-05-30 13:11 ` [patch 6/7] CAN: Add maintainer entries Urs Thuermann
2007-05-30 13:11 ` [patch 7/7] CAN: Add documentation Urs Thuermann
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-11-16 15:02 [PATCH 0/7] CAN: New PF_CAN protocol family for 2.6.25, update Urs Thuermann
2007-11-16 15:02 ` [PATCH 5/7] CAN: Add virtual CAN netdevice driver Urs Thuermann
2007-11-14 12:13 [PATCH 0/7] CAN: New PF_CAN protocol family for 2.6.25 Urs Thuermann
2007-11-14 12:13 ` [PATCH 5/7] CAN: Add virtual CAN netdevice driver Urs Thuermann
2007-11-14 12:51 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-11-14 13:36 ` Urs Thuermann
2007-11-14 13:45 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-05 10:49 [PATCH 0/7] CAN: Add new PF_CAN protocol family, try #10 Urs Thuermann
2007-10-05 10:49 ` [PATCH 5/7] CAN: Add virtual CAN netdevice driver Urs Thuermann
2007-10-02 13:10 [PATCH 0/7] CAN: Add new PF_CAN protocol family, try #9 Urs Thuermann
2007-10-02 13:10 ` [PATCH 5/7] CAN: Add virtual CAN netdevice driver Urs Thuermann
2007-10-02 14:20 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2007-10-02 15:07 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-10-02 16:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2007-10-02 21:02 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-10-02 21:43 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2007-10-02 21:50 ` David Miller
2007-10-03 7:06 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-10-02 21:52 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-02 22:04 ` David Miller
2007-10-03 17:47 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-10-04 11:52 ` Urs Thuermann
2007-09-25 12:20 [PATCH 0/7] CAN: Add new PF_CAN protocol family, try #8 Urs Thuermann
2007-09-25 12:20 ` [PATCH 5/7] CAN: Add virtual CAN netdevice driver Urs Thuermann
2007-09-25 13:26 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2007-09-25 14:00 ` Urs Thuermann
2007-09-25 14:47 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-09-25 17:55 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-09-25 17:53 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-09-25 19:09 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-09-20 18:43 [PATCH 0/7] CAN: Add new PF_CAN protocol family, try #7 Urs Thuermann
2007-09-20 18:43 ` [PATCH 5/7] CAN: Add virtual CAN netdevice driver Urs Thuermann
2007-09-27 15:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-09-27 16:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-09-27 19:18 ` David Miller
2007-09-28 8:48 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-09-28 16:52 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-09-28 18:33 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-09-17 10:03 [PATCH 0/7] CAN: Add new PF_CAN protocol family, try #6 Urs Thuermann
2007-09-17 10:03 ` [PATCH 5/7] CAN: Add virtual CAN netdevice driver Urs Thuermann
2007-09-18 15:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-09-18 22:24 ` Urs Thuermann
2007-09-19 6:26 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-09-19 8:41 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-08-04 2:06 [patch 0/7] CAN: Add new PF_CAN protocol family, try #5 Urs Thuermann
2007-08-04 2:07 ` [patch 5/7] CAN: Add virtual CAN netdevice driver Urs Thuermann
2007-06-22 3:44 [patch 0/7] CAN: Add new PF_CAN protocol family, try #3 Urs Thuermann
2007-06-22 3:44 ` [patch 5/7] CAN: Add virtual CAN netdevice driver Urs Thuermann
2007-06-22 11:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-22 12:22 ` Urs Thuermann
2007-06-22 12:38 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-23 12:05 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-06-23 12:52 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-23 15:13 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-06-23 16:25 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-23 16:42 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-06-23 17:13 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-07-04 11:37 ` Urs Thuermann
2007-07-04 14:01 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-07-09 11:37 ` Urs Thuermann
2007-07-09 14:18 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-07-09 15:27 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-07-11 19:41 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-07-11 22:52 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-07-16 6:05 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-07-16 8:37 ` David Miller
2007-07-16 13:08 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-07-16 16:27 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-07-16 13:07 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-07-16 16:00 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-06-23 21:01 ` David Miller
2007-06-23 21:44 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-06-23 20:51 ` David Miller
2007-06-23 21:49 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-05-16 14:51 [patch 0/7] CAN: Add new PF_CAN protocol family Urs Thuermann
2007-05-16 14:51 ` [patch 5/7] CAN: Add virtual CAN netdevice driver Urs Thuermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46630805.9070309@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.hartkopp@volkswagen.de \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=urs@isnogud.escape.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.