* [LARTC] Wan optimizations with linux
@ 2007-06-07 1:19 Diego Woitasen
2007-06-07 2:12 ` Grant Taylor
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Diego Woitasen @ 2007-06-07 1:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Hi,
I'm researching for WAN optimizations with linux. My network is
composed for MPLS network connecting 200 branches against a central
site. I use Linux machines to provide security with IPSEC in the
branches and in the central site. Now I'm lookup for techniques for
optimization the link. My first ideas was use IPCOMP and proxy to
cache traffic of HTTP applications. Somebody have any other idea to
get better utilization of WAN links with Linux?
I had seen commercial appliances that do dictionary compression and
other cool things, but I don't want to use they.
regards,
diegows
--
-------------------
Diego Woitasen
-------------------
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] Wan optimizations with linux
2007-06-07 1:19 [LARTC] Wan optimizations with linux Diego Woitasen
@ 2007-06-07 2:12 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-07 5:18 ` Greg Scott
2007-06-07 20:25 ` Grant Taylor
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Grant Taylor @ 2007-06-07 2:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On 6/6/2007 8:19 PM, Diego Woitasen wrote:
> I'm researching for WAN optimizations with linux. My network is
> composed for MPLS network connecting 200 branches against a central
> site. I use Linux machines to provide security with IPSEC in the
> branches and in the central site. Now I'm lookup for techniques for
> optimization the link. My first ideas was use IPCOMP and proxy to
> cache traffic of HTTP applications. Somebody have any other idea to
> get better utilization of WAN links with Linux?
I have never been a really big fan of trying to compress traffic on one
side of a link and decompress it on the other side.
Something else to consider is what you are trying to optimize. Are you
trying to get more bandwidth, or better latency, or what. If you are
dealing with lots of long distance links, you may want to look in to
playing with TCP window size(s) so that you can have more data in
transit at one time with out pausing for acknowledgments.
I would recommend that you use QoS to make sure that your priority
traffic is put through first and that the rest is shared as evenly as
possible or as you want it to be.
Proxies, local replicating file servers, local store and forward email
servers that can directly route messages, are all good things.
With out knowing more about your configuration, I can't offer much more
than general things to look at.
Grant. . . .
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [LARTC] Wan optimizations with linux
2007-06-07 1:19 [LARTC] Wan optimizations with linux Diego Woitasen
2007-06-07 2:12 ` Grant Taylor
@ 2007-06-07 5:18 ` Greg Scott
2007-06-07 20:25 ` Grant Taylor
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg Scott @ 2007-06-07 5:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
> I'm researching for WAN optimizations with linux.
Are you doing lots of HTTP and SSL traffic to an internal website? If
so, maybe it makes sense to put Squid on your remote sites. Squid is
an open source web proxy and I know at least some of the commercial
stuff depends on it. I've had good luck at a few sites doing Squid.
- Greg Scott
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] Wan optimizations with linux
2007-06-07 1:19 [LARTC] Wan optimizations with linux Diego Woitasen
2007-06-07 2:12 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-07 5:18 ` Greg Scott
@ 2007-06-07 20:25 ` Grant Taylor
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Grant Taylor @ 2007-06-07 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On 06/07/07 09:31, Diego Woitasen wrote:
> My configuration is very simple, the branches only have HTTP and VOIP
> traffc agaisnt central site. My question is about general tools to
> optimize WAN traffic.
Short of an HTTP proxy that uses compression between it and its parent
proxy(s) and proper codecs, I can't think of any thing else off hand to
try to help.
I suppose you could use PPP across the link and try deflate
compression... But in my opinion the PPP encapsulation would just make
things nasty.
Grant. . . .
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-06-07 20:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-06-07 1:19 [LARTC] Wan optimizations with linux Diego Woitasen
2007-06-07 2:12 ` Grant Taylor
2007-06-07 5:18 ` Greg Scott
2007-06-07 20:25 ` Grant Taylor
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.