From: Robert de Rooy <robert.de.rooy@gmail.com>
To: Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bzolnier@gmail.com,
linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org,
"linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: libata and legacy ide pcmcia failure
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 00:06:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4669D2D8.3020806@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46694FB2.6040007@pobox.com>
Mark Lord wrote:
> I still don't see much evidence that interrupts are actually
> functioning here.
> It would be good to see /proc/interrupts before/after libata tries to
> talk to it.
>
> Let's assume for the moment that interrupts are b0rken.
> The legacy IDE driver can talk to such devices completely without
> interrupts,
> if the IDE polling patch (below) is applied.
>
> So, Robert: could you try again with the old IDE driver,
> except apply this patch to it first? This will give valuable info.
I tried the patch, but a get a kernel panic on boot with it. I can try
to get a screenshot of it tomorrow.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-08 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-15 18:59 libata pcmcia failure Robert de Rooy
2007-05-17 8:42 ` Robert de Rooy
2007-05-17 20:15 ` libata and legacy ide " Robert de Rooy
2007-05-20 11:31 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-20 21:13 ` Robert de Rooy
2007-05-21 11:50 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-21 12:37 ` Alan Cox
2007-05-21 12:42 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-21 15:10 ` Robert de Rooy
2007-05-21 15:18 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-21 16:11 ` Robert de Rooy
2007-05-21 16:22 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-21 17:16 ` Robert de Rooy
2007-05-21 21:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-22 19:37 ` Robert de Rooy
2007-05-23 14:02 ` Alan Cox
2007-05-23 18:47 ` Robert de Rooy
2007-06-06 20:27 ` Robert de Rooy
2007-06-07 7:28 ` Tejun Heo
2007-06-07 19:22 ` Robert de Rooy
2007-06-08 7:10 ` Tejun Heo
2007-06-08 12:46 ` Mark Lord
2007-06-08 12:46 ` Mark Lord
2007-06-08 22:06 ` Robert de Rooy [this message]
2007-06-08 22:11 ` Mark Lord
2007-06-10 1:01 ` Robert de Rooy
2007-06-10 20:46 ` Mark Lord
2007-06-10 21:50 ` Robert de Rooy
2007-06-10 22:13 ` Russell King
2007-06-10 22:26 ` Mark Lord
2007-06-11 22:36 ` Robert de Rooy
2007-06-11 22:40 ` Mark Lord
2007-06-11 22:40 ` Mark Lord
2007-06-12 3:24 ` Tejun Heo
2007-06-13 1:36 ` Albert Lee
2007-06-14 9:39 ` Tejun Heo
2007-06-22 11:51 ` Robert de Rooy
2007-06-22 13:32 ` Mark Lord
2007-06-25 4:04 ` Albert Lee
2007-06-25 9:31 ` Robert de Rooy
2007-06-25 10:15 ` Albert Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4669D2D8.3020806@gmail.com \
--to=robert.de.rooy@gmail.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mlord@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.